• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm always editing my posts before clicking reply without checking them over they end up reading like a mental patient wrote them.
 
I am going to hire @Squiggy to make my fan film "Prelude to Prosecution."
It will be 30 minutes long and will contain interviews with various members of the Axanar team - each portrayed by "professional" actors - interspersed with shots of the U.S.S. Ares crashing into buildings, getting shot down by CBS C&D7s, blowing up from hubris drive overloads, etc. Tony Todd has already agreed to contemplate tweeting about his possible decision to accept or reject our proposed concept art for an offer sheet that may or may not contain his name.
 
I am going to hire @Squiggy to make my fan film "Prelude to Prosecution."
It will be 30 minutes long and will contain interviews with various members of the Axanar team - each portrayed by "professional" actors - interspersed with shots of the U.S.S. Ares crashing into buildings, getting shot down by CBS C&D7s, blowing up from hubris drive overloads, etc. Tony Todd has already agreed to contemplate tweeting about his possible decision to accept or reject our proposed concept art for an offer sheet that may or may not contain his name.

Really...? Can I be a part of the production?
 
I'm always editing my posts before clicking reply without checking them over they end up reading like a mental patient wrote them.

That comes from the editing. Sometimes we make things worse without noticing, change one part of a sentence but don't adjust the rest.
 
listen to the Axanar official podcast of 8/30/15, with Alec and the director being interviewed, repeatedly talk about how they are using other people's IP, having a program in place to license their IP to others, a dump on Renegade for not having business smarts about CBS IP and "never having official sanction" (listen for "oh we hired the best lawyers.."), the 'little heads' of fans, and if CBS gets upset that their IP is being used without permission, sorry but they arent using it... then another section about the future of Ares studios, a place where they can show equity investors the quality of their work, and deliberately doing productions to guild auspices so their work can be picked up by CBS in the future, and creating a studio known for great genre movies as they will be known for making quality Star Trek, and how CBS should (but refused to) let them (Axanar) license Star Trek products to resell "because they are working at such a high level"...

listen for this highlight at approx 30:10, and how the rest of the sentence is finished
"but, you do not want to do things that are gonna piss off CBS..."

minutes 20 - 40: http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/7/c/3/7c3...53190718&hwt=c39fed7a1354f7143c18cfdb4eaa40a8

and this was just a single dip into what they have put online. I just don't know how they think anything can save them..

Some more quotes from Alec Peters from this thread:
Alec Peters from 3 years ago is a total Axanar hater... :D :guffaw:

listen to the podcast section highlighted above, especially the part where Alec talks about how invalid the Renegade defense is, and the part about not pissing of CBS. Adds to your list, and this is recent.
 
listen to the podcast section highlighted above, especially the part where Alec talks about how invalid the Renegade defense is, and the part about not pissing of CBS. Adds to your list, and this is recent.

Yes, not a fan of that exchange. At least we got our film done and showed it to CBS like we planed to do. The big difference is we (STNV and STC also) respect CBS and understand that Star Trek is their property not ours.
 
I am tired of the Axanar team trying to throw everyone under the bus. It's cowardly and childish.

Not only that, but now they're trying to paint themselves as protectors of all fan productions, which is hypocritical on so many levels, especially considering Peters snitched on others and tried to convince CBS to take them down.
 
I worked for insurance carriers for the most part (and it was years ago) and I don't recall anything like a background check being done prior to taking someone's case even when I worked for an indie firm. Doesn't mean they don't happen now, but a firm is probably under no obligation and it doesn't change things much except in the context of, in non-pro bono matters, whether a client can conceivably pay legal bills. Doing a background check to answer that question may or may not be ethical, BTW. Lawyers are not required to starve, but at the same time, if they only take cases because someone can pay, that means a lot of people would go without representation (hence pro bono exists). But I digress.

Thanks for that. Was just curious since I've never had cause to hire a lawyer before. :)

As for myself, I am finished with the StandWithCBS group after I was kicked off unfairly after mentioning opinions

eh?
 
And now for something utterly made up about Alec Peters... I tweeted a complete lie about him - accusing him of theft and assault of a Head of State. He has replied...

AND I AM NOT BEING THREATENED!!!

Alec_Peters.jpg
 
Man I wonder if any of the 20 John Doe candidates are pissed that Axanar is pushing back this hard. This pretty much gaurantees that CBS will name John Does and add them to the suit right?
 
while I wouldn't personally publish something like this, it is still interesting to note in the response that he edited the meaning to change who is in the hot seat.

I understand your viewpoint, but I don't agree... Alec has clearly seen it as a joke and is replying as such. If he has been reading this thread, he knows I have been posting the tweets here from time to time - lets just have a bit of a laugh about the whole thing before we go mental
 
From a reddit thread on the firm that took the case:

"From the picture Alec posted with the attorneys it looks like the firm gave this case to two of their newest lawyers. It's a proving ground for them, to see how well those lawyers can argue a case."

"So its basically the lawyer version of the Kobayashi Maru."
 
From a reddit thread on the firm that took the case:

"From the picture Alec posted with the attorneys it looks like the firm gave this case to two of their newest lawyers. It's a proving ground for them, to see how well those lawyers can argue a case."

"So its basically the lawyer version of the Kobayashi Maru."

Are they going to reprogram the Judge?
 
From a reddit thread on the firm that took the case:

"From the picture Alec posted with the attorneys it looks like the firm gave this case to two of their newest lawyers. It's a proving ground for them, to see how well those lawyers can argue a case."

"So its basically the lawyer version of the Kobayashi Maru."
Well, they might have bothered to look up her resume. No, she's not a neophyte.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top