Axanar isn't "special snowflake" just because they have a facebook group.
But... they have (at least) three!
Star Trek itself has several...
Axanar isn't "special snowflake" just because they have a facebook group.
But... they have (at least) three!
Strong feeling of dejá vu here. Anybody heard anything back from Al Vinci yet? How'd the meeting with CBS go? Moving the production to Canada?
Alec has revealed his defence
"Don't Blame Me, I Voted for Kodos"
![]()
Everything I've read of the man leads me to believe Roddenberry would've sued the piss out of Alec Peters over Axanar.
Balrog said:I never gave them a dime, but liked what they did with the 20 min prelude video. But this was exactly when I bailed. It was a "bait and switch" on the donors. And worse still, using donated funds to create a new business that would profit THEM. Be damned CBS/Paramount's beef, the donors should have been up in arms at that point.
Everything I've read of the man leads me to believe Roddenberry would've sued the piss out of Alec Peters over Axanar.
Likely, yes. Let's be honest, for whatever his public image (and I'm not commenting as to his personal life, cause I don't know that side), everything about him from people that's had business dealings with Gene point to never getting between him and a dollar when it came to making money on Star Trek.
Don't know if this was shared here yet - http://1701news.com/node/980/axanar-will-ruin-fan-trek-everyone.html
Is anyone else seeing Legal Zoom ads in the sidebar? Kinda amusing.
Don't know if this was shared here yet - http://1701news.com/node/980/axanar-will-ruin-fan-trek-everyone.html
Is anyone else seeing Legal Zoom ads in the sidebar? Kinda amusing.
Don't know if this was shared here yet - http://1701news.com/node/980/axanar-will-ruin-fan-trek-everyone.html
Is anyone else seeing Legal Zoom ads in the sidebar? Kinda amusing.
No i see Ikea ads as I have been on their site today... I assume at some point you must have Googled some legal information maybe?
Question for the fan-film producers in here:
If you were willing to work with AP before, does all this make you less likely to work with him in the future, or are you willing to cut him a break because of what he could bring to your project?
I never implied any of that. I simply said Paramount doesn't expect work for "freebies".You think Paramount is gonna get people working on Star Trek Beyond for freebies?
At the same time, it's not true that Hollywood happily pays everyone what they're worth. VFX houses in particular have seriously gotten the shaft (Rhythm & Hughes situation anyone?) And Hollywood is notorious for its creative accounting that cheats people out of their contractual royalty cuts. And as for unions, well, think of how much work winds up moving to non-Union locations these days. Seems like more the norm than the exception, and it's been tilting that way at least since the early 90s (X-Files in Canada was kind of a trendsetter, and one of the major locations of ST: Beyond)
There was nothing "overboard" about my very simple statement.So let's not go overboard on presenting the TV/Film industry as a paragon of virtuous business practices.
Yeah I don't think I'd be comfortable working with Peters in any field - film or otherwise -after this debacle.
Meanwhile...
![]()
The thing I've found most humorous about this is on the one hand, the producers call Axanar a "ground-breaking independent Star Trek film," then say on the other hand, Peters says, "We're doing what other fan films have done for thirty years."
I wonder what the average donation to this project was? The price of a movie ticket, perhaps?
The thing I've found most humorous about this is on the one hand, the producers call Axanar a "ground-breaking independent Star Trek film," then say on the other hand, Peters says, "We're doing what other fan films have done for thirty years."
But I don't blame CBS for drawing the line here. The availability of crowdsourcing, relatively affordable high-quality FX production equipment, and more ways than even ten or fifteen years ago for mass viewings of the product does at least threaten the integrity of the original product (and not just Trek, but all franchises where fan films are made). After Axanar, whose to say someone won't come up with a $3 million professional production values "fan film" for "Star Trek" or whatever?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.