It is possible but like our Janet says settlement is more likely what kind of settlement that is well?????
CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar
- Thread starter Richard Baker
- Start date
- Status
It is possible but like our Janet says settlement is more likely what kind of settlement that is well?????
At this point, my expectation is that anyone invited to get involved in a fan film that violates said new rules would have to look at Axanar and ask themselves "What's the worst that could happen?"
That is why they need to get a massive boot in the balls lol for what they have done and NOT allowed to carry on in any shape or form or it would be like you said "whats the worse that can happen" a few months in court and then allowed to carry on.
I know that and you know that, but Paramount might not
Define "everyone."
Nope...that was Y2K...and it never happened...too late to wish this nightmare had never happened...been lurking and learning again, for the last couple of days and pages, and you got to ask yourself...why and how it came to this???...the easy answer is the High Lord of Pathology and his Master Plan, but there is so much more to this Awful Axanarishness. I am certain down to my scrambled molecules in the Transporter that we have not seen the end, nor can we know the fallout, down the star lane...
That's the score in some old videogames!
I think this will somehow come out, at least, as a new videogame. Ax the Nar, or some such...
As well as an interesting read (documentary?) when all is said and done.
Madame Chief Justice Jespah could weigh in with her opinion as to whether the Outcome will make it in the syllabi in law schools for courses on "Copyright and Infringement"...
As well as an interesting read (documentary?) when all is said and done.
Madame Chief Justice Jespah could weigh in with her opinion as to whether the Outcome will make it in the syllabi in law schools for courses on "Copyright and Infringement"...
My guess, that's what Erin Ranahan is after. It sounds like she wants this to go to trial so she can make case-law.
Imagine her surprise when the Axanar greatest hits kept coming.
I think it's much more likely that the Judge reads her the riot act before lecturing her like a first year law student with something along the lines of "don't ever waste my time with this kind of nonsense again"
Wonder if they will boost tuition costs for the Copyright & Infringement courses I mentioned above. So much to learn...so much to sort out! Seems only natural to ge a little more "LawCrowd"-Funding, as it were.
Plus, as an homage to Chancellor Infringement, Benefactor of Law-Fouling, perhaps naming a Law School Campus Bulding after him?...
...or something.
Plus, as an homage to Chancellor Infringement, Benefactor of Law-Fouling, perhaps naming a Law School Campus Bulding after him?...
...or something.
I missed this the first time thru .....
Could that argument not be presented for any copyright case?????
They are, in essence, saying that any copyright law is un-Constitutional because any ruling against the infringer violates their First Amendment rights.
How novel of an idea is that???
Sarcasm?!?
For all the jokes and sarcasm - this is one of the two core reasons I'm following this to the bitter end.
The entire idea that's came up that a trademark or copyright can be 'hijacked' because someone else thinks they have a right to it is extremely offensive and dangerous and opens doors that will cause significant damage across the board. All the focus is on fan films and studios etc - but if there was ANY movement or doors opened even a little for someone to take my branding/properties, that'd be a step towards not paying the rent.
Huge and dramatic leap from A to B - but if that defence was given any credit whatsoever, the potential for it to be expanded and abused by other parties down the line is terrifying.
That's what I find so distastefully odious about W&S's defense of AP. They are basically claiming AP has a legal right to be a thief.
Last edited:
- Status