CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar
- Thread starter Richard Baker
- Start date
- Status
I realize she's just meeting her pro bono quota for the year, but she's barely following her own case. She should not have been startled by that reaction.
This might mean more
If I wasn't old enough to actually remember those cars on the road, I'd swear that car had been Photoshopped in that picture.
Why, yes. Yes it does.
In other news, apparently the trial has been moved up to January 31, 2017. Peters is still claiming victory could be his.
Who's ever happy to have his trial moved up? Of course it does mean they could get "Axanar" back into production by March 2017 in time for its June 2019 premiere.
So, there's a script, a prelude that sets it up, sets under construction, FX done, three minutes of film shot, a cast (what's left of it), costumes, and so on, but the movie is not in production yet. Yeah.
He did say "we expect to win at least part of that motion" (exclude the Axanar movie), which suggests his attorneys are talking they won't win the summary judgment. But the judge seems still to be writing the decision for up to a few weeks.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
They say that they have not made the movie, but isn't the Vulcan Scene not a part of that movie? If so, they have created part of it
Alec is a lying cheapskate and i challenge him to deny it
Alec is a lying cheapskate and i challenge him to deny it
This might mean more
apparently ordered with no fan windows or tinted glass option. people said they could see the console pleather outgas as they felt like an ant under a magnifying glass.
Yes the Vulcan seen was presented as the teaser to the film. So part of the movie is done the copyright infringed, cant change the past. The only benefit is they can reduce the number of copyrights violated to just to the Vulcan scene.
There was a documentary created by supporters of rotating blade equipped air-con units he was pleased about
Courts continue to schedule as if the case is moving forward, even if there are outstanding motions to dismiss, or for summary judgment. Obviously, if the MTD motion is successful, then the schedule would be cancelled. But they still have to schedule it.
That doesn't matter. What matters is what their intentions were as they raised the $1.3 million. That is what discovery would show.
One of the things that will be looked at? That locked script from August 2015 they displayed so proudly. That would be turned over in discovery. As would previous drafts during the fundraising and before the fundraising.
If they were raising money with the intent to infringe copyright, whether it's produced or not doesn't mean shit.
It does seem incredible that W&S would put this forward; do lawyers always argue trash without shame to see if something will stick?
(Kalo voice)
It happens, pal.
Are those the necessary ingredients for ridiculousity?
Passive-aggressive rhetorical questions are optional, as well.
- Status