Why isn't "Horizon" being targeted if it's all about quality?
Why isn't "Horizon" being targeted if it's all about quality?
On information and belief, Defendants enjoy a direct financial benefit from the preparation, duplication, and distribution of the infringing Axanar Works.
This is why he has a serious "ticking clock" issue. Propworx will likely never be able to pay the rent for the studio space on it's own, so unless they can get Ares Digital or studio rentals or for profit making films up to speed very quickly, they will go tits up on the rent expense alone, not to mention utilities and insurance.And the funny thing is that now the Propworx storage issue is nil. There is this location where there also is a studio that seems perfect as a location for ... oh wait, it already is.
Whether that mean the $1.2 million they've raised, how they're spending that money, Alec's $38k salary, or the coffee, "perks", donor store, or whatever, the key point is, when it comes down to it, CBS and Paramount could potentially lose money from Axanar.
Its baffling to me that Peters, an Attorney, misses that point.
ETA: Or maybe he's not missing it. Maybe he's trying to push blame elsewhere so he can save face for his fanbase in whatever his next endeavor may be.
Well he studied law. Years ago. I studied chemistry. Doesn't mean I know how to cook meth.He's a trained lawyer. How could the dude miss it?
ETA: Or maybe he's not missing it. Maybe he's trying to push blame elsewhere so he can save face for his fanbase in whatever his next endeavor may be.
But, his award is only for one of his companies named Auctionworks (really poor writing... not surprised), which he won for "Realizing Business Potential." I'm taking two things away from this: The first being it seems to me he can do well with auctions. Maybe he got in over his head with Propworks. The second thing is: Alec really needs to stop utilizing "works" in his businesses.
I'm sure he knew exactly what he was doing - he was just hoping to get away with it or he was hoping to stay just under CBS's radar.He's a trained lawyer. How could the dude miss it?
His bio says "an attorney by training."Well he studied law. Years ago. I studied chemistry. Doesn't mean I know how to cook meth.
Why isn't "Horizon" being targeted if it's all about quality?
This is why he has a serious "ticking clock" issue. Propworx will likely never be able to pay the rent for the studio space on it's own, so unless they can get Ares Digital or studio rentals or for profit making films up to speed very quickly, they will go tits up on the rent expense alone, not to mention utilities and insurance.
Which is a way of saying "I went to law school but never did anything with it."His bio says "an attorney by training."
Bingo!
I know it's not nice, but Peters is a slimy piece of shit and if he had an ounce of morals, he would give the donors their money back.
Of course there is. There's no evidence in the studios' legal complaint or recent actions that they have a problem with fan films in general, just Axanar in particular, which they characterized as a "professional commercial venture trading off our property."It occurs to me that this Situation is, of course, a Got Damn Shame, and all the Legal Rest, but, has anyone thought about Axanar-Gate, in terms of its future effects on possible Fan Films? Depending on the ultimate ruling, will there even be a prayer of any kind of creative "amateur" endeavor?
Look to that possibility being something CBS demands in a settlement: We'll forego damages if you give all the remaining money you raised from Kickstarter, Indiegogo and your own direct fundraising back to donors.He does not have most of it to give back. If he started to give money back to some of the donors but not all of them, that would create a big shitstorm as well. Morally he should give it back, even if he divides up what is in the account, by the total number of donors, and gives them all back even a portion of what they donated that gesture would go a long way. Thing is he is not going to do that. He may give some back to the ones that are persistent about it, but those that say nothing he will just keep.
Look to that possibility being something CBS demands in a settlement: We'll forego damages if you give all the remaining money you raised from Kickstarter, Indiegogo and your own direct fundraising back to donors.
Win/win: You avoid damages you could never hope to pay and we demonstrate our magnanimity to fans.
If the studios view crowdfunding as a problem requiring accounting oversight then they may end it simply because they're never going to take on that kind of administrative burden. Not to mention that the crowdfunding platforms themselves, flouting their own terms of service, make money off fan films' fundraising. So, yeah, that aspect will pose a problem going forward.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.