Sort of Draconian, wouldn't you say?
On AxaMonitor: We finally find out who sits on Axanar's so-called independent financial review board, only to discover one of them has already resigned. Naturally, it's all MY fault.Fan Film Factor has a preliminary interview with Alec Peters on the Financial Committee. Not a lot of details as that is next interview but lists who is on committee:
http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/01/13...and-his-review-committee-interview/#more-3264
Far as I am aware, all they did was unfollow everyone they were following. Which they did not have to do – they could have accomplished the same thing (getting rid of too many email notifications, so far as I am aware, was the motivation) by simply adjusting their preferences.Am trying to understand the why of this twitter thing the production account is doing. I don't have a twitter account and only understand the basics.
Can whomever a twitter account belongs to delete every tweet to and from them at their discretion? Like say, could I unfriend my 109K followers and delete alllll the tweets whether I was the tweeter or it was my Friended tweeters? So like erase everything and make the account a clean slate?
I'm pretty sure I understand the restart with the unFriending. To bring order to chaos, right? And get the account populated with actual Friends? Whereas in the beginning of the account the blowback, the magnitude of the Star Trek magnifying glass on Everything, then this lawsuit just wasn't foreseen. Then everything turned into this whole thing. With, like fandom has been known for for 50 years... all the dissecting every single flaw in every single ST episode, series, movie, authorized and fan produced. And each and every person responsible for every single word in the scripts. Every showrunner, writer, director, producer who doesn't do it the way sections of us wanted. Tear to shreds any actor we might not like, dissect and discuss everything anyone who worked on Star Trek has said or done in their lives outside of ST, every DUI, arrest, breakdown, weight gain, et cetera........... you know, just doing what fans who wish to have always done with Star Trek done by anyone.
And for a long time the account was a promotional kind of account to get the word about the production to a really wide a twitter audience. Probably? Everybody's happy, things are great, it's great, he's great, the world of Star Trek is great.
But like with all Star Trek productions, authorized or fan, everybody in fandom can an opinion. And those of us who wish to can get very loud about our opinions. Both our likes and our dislikes.
Then this new Star Trek production and producer starts being looked at with the same Star Trek magnifying glass used on allllll Star Trek productions; official or fan. And this ST magnifying glass that's been used on everything Star Trek for 50 years..... was and still is not tolerated by this producer. Who responded in the least effective way imaginable to mitigate and get past it. He goes on the attack.
And how did that turn out?
The lawsuit, the questions, the research, the demands, the anger, the responses to the questions and/or points of fact. Stuff like that. Which turns the twitter account into an access point to the production after the production's Facebook went private because 'it' had ceased to be effective for promoting the production & Works when it all stopped being all 'everything is grreaaattt'.
The production is facebooking the twitter account now too, right? Like they did the production's website comments sections too.
So I get the unFriending thing from the production/producer's POV. Only the like minded will be reFriended. That will bring order to chaos like it did with Facebook and the production website. Order.
My main question I guess is can a twitter account delete every single tweet and start all over with a clean slate?
As for deleting everything and starting from scratch, it looks like you need a tool like this: http://deletealltweets.com/connect.php?hl=en (I have never used that tool and never heard of it until Googling it just now, so I can't comment on its effectiveness).
So easy, and with a click of a...yup, just like thatIt works very well, for the record. Your tweet count remains, but all content is flushed out. I've done it before by accident when showing someone else how easy it was![]()
Independent.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Alec’s reply (for some reason, he e-mailed it to me):
“Independent” means they are not employees. And since we have no employees, these people are independent. A review committed for any Fortune 500 company has PAID board members do this work. And you have an “Axanar Team Member” because he knows what went on and provides critical insight.
There is this exchange in the comment of the article where Alec Peters gives his definition of independent via an email to Mr. Lane:
Alec’s reply (for some reason, he e-mailed it to me):
“Independent” means they are not employees. And since we have no employees, these people are independent. A review committed for any Fortune 500 company has PAID board members do this work. And you have an “Axanar Team Member” because he knows what went on and provides critical insight.
Or "does as Alec says".Unless proven otherwise, I will assume that in this case "independent" means "likely to cover up and/or sweep under the rug AP's spending".
Better add some Theragin derivative to that...Good grief. At least no one who wields such flimsy, simplistic, self-serving thinking to contort words could ever wind up running this country. ... wait, what? Bartender, pour me another Tranya.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.