I don't think Alec Peters has the technical wherewithal to unleash something so sophisticated online![]()
Wordpress is easy, this is probably the limit of his wherewithal

I don't think Alec Peters has the technical wherewithal to unleash something so sophisticated online![]()
I think you're being quite generous there (not going soft are you?). I believe it's more likely he'd hire someone to create such a thing and pay them with, well, never you mind how he's paying them....Wordpress is easy, this is probably the limit of his wherewithal![]()
I think you are referring to the first use doctrine where if you buy a book you can sell it later but you don't acquire rights to the IP in the book, characters, reproduction of the story etc. But if things with the logo were sold by Paramount knowing that they would wind up in fan movies that would be different.I can't find verification of it yet but I 'think' an item of theirs sold at auction can be resold and auctioned endlessly after that. .
I think you are referring to the first use doctrine where if you buy a book you can sell it later but you don't acquire rights to the IP in the book, characters, reproduction of the story etc. But if things with the logo were sold by Paramount knowing that they would wind up in fan movies that would be different.
And another thing, what about conventions. Where is the legality of people dressing up and using those logos etc at conventions, comic cons, etc, Do the promoters pay royalties to Paramount/CBS when the conventions are held?
Since the conventions are profit making enterprises and charge admission I am a little unclear on how it is just fine except for the studio not wanting to go that far after the loyal fans.Fans making their own costumes for noncommercial convention use seems to be just fine. I suppose if it was something that cast the character in a really bad light, they might object, but I haven't heard of such a case.
I think as far as the logo and lets say "warp" drive they might have crossed into the public domain by their use. "Beam me up Scotty" was never actually in the series. Even if the logo hasn't I think it's widespread use would perhaps limit statutory damages for that usage while that defense wouldn't be available for the characters.
Since the conventions are profit making enterprises and charge admission I am a little unclear on how it is just fine except for the studio not wanting to go that far after the loyal fans.
I'm not saying the Axanar group has a strong case because I think its a bad case and asking for the garbage they are (financial records) is just running up costs. I do understand how the producer and others are taking it personally but some of them are in the wrong while the fans are going to be disappointed.
As far as the other productions are concerned the 15 minute length for those already shot, I don't believe is "fair." Especially taking into account that some of those groups worked with Paramount on not shooting the Norman Spinrad script so the studio definitely had knowledge of these things going on along with the other episodes shot.
I was looking forward at some point to seeing the Bread and Savagery episode and after all this find that the post production ceased.
Not to be too cryptic but there could be another strategy for the fans if there was enough support. Supposedly there are hundreds of millions of US fans which should count for something.
Since the conventions are profit making enterprises and charge admission I am a little unclear on how it is just fine except for the studio not wanting to go that far after the loyal fans.
I don't think so. Reading it suggests it was prior to his departure so it's probably a "hater".Damn........my guess would be either Alec himself or Jonathan Lane........ (who will no doubt be getting slapped with a libel suit at some point I'd guess)
Usually the convention organizers usually are not hiring the costume-wearers. They do not require people to attend in costume. And they are not advertising costumed fans as an attraction of the event. There is no direct connection between the organization, that runs the event (and profits from it), and the choice clothing the paying attendees make.
That helped my afternoon chuckle, ThanksI don't think so. Reading it suggests it was prior to his departure so it's probably a "hater".
That was my thought too.I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that that Wordpress page was produced by the person whose facebook contretemps with Terry is documented there.
Who is that? I think there have been more than one...I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that that Wordpress page was produced by the person whose facebook contretemps with Terry is documented there.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.