The Axanar list probably would be attractive to scam artists...
You could see it in the body language when he was asked when he had any last words about the matter.
This is something I am wondering about. How can the studios tell people they may not take full actions to protect their work, if some protection is automatic as soon as a script is set down? Isn't this somehow tortuous interference, (of necessity and by silence) acknowledging people have copyright automatically, but saying they may not claim the full rights thereby unless they wish to be sued? I could see someone making the argument that you can't concede the first without allowing the second, since the second was never intended to be a separable part of the law you are acknowledging by conceding copyright-by-fixing.
I agree; the list probably would be attractive to scammers. They do buy mailing lists. This is one of the reasons why we see such awful, obvious spam. The bar is set exceptionally low, so if anyone falls for it, their name goes on the list as someone who will buy or download anything.
To address your other point, yes, it is going to be interesting - but tortious interference refers to interference with contract, which is not what we have here. I believe the intention is to keep fan filmmakers from asserting copyright (or DMCA take down notices) for items already copyrighted by the IP holders. So, I can't assert copyright over the
Enterprise. But there is more to it. E. g. if I made a knockoff of the
Ares, well, the
Ares is purely derivative of various copyrighted properties. When it comes to the designer of the
Ares (hi, Sean

), under the guidelines, I believe he would
not be able to assert copyright. But that makes sense. You aren't supposed to be able to copyright derivative works; the guidelines merely codify that. That may be an area of law which comes into play (no pun intended) within the next decade or so, though. In our
remix/sample/everybody's a star/24 hours must be filled somehow culture, more people remix and repurpose art than ever before.
But it's tricky with the McKennah character. Is she based on anyone? Extremely loosely, I suppose she is based on Troi, in that they are both female ship's counselors. After that, though, the parallels just plain aren't there. Furthermore, female counselor characters exist in other properties. Hell, doesn't Barbra Streisand play one in (IIRC)
Prince of Tides? It's quite simply not a unique set of character traits, particularly as McKennah isn't alien or part-alien. Hence STC may be able to claim that character as copyrightable. The guidelines should not be able to prevent them from registering that character, I believe. I think that would make for an interesting question for Mr. Van Citters when he appears on
Engage. Can McKennah be copyrighted? And if she can be, then, by extension, can Ashley Robinson's character in
Red Shirt Diaries also be copyrighted?