• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS Digital needs more time to produce promised quality!

More COFFEE!! I demand more COFFEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

Hey, if they want to work under the same conditions as the original creators, then they got that part of the show's spirit all figured out.
 
Hey, I'm enjoying the hell out of these. I say keep up the good work...I'm sorry they are under such time restraints, but I understand it's the nature of the beast. All things considered, these episodes look great.
 
Given that the CBS folks seem willing to let them go back and redo stuff if needed (in addition to fixing the Mirror Mirror error; they said they were going to redo some shots of episodes already completed with their new 1701 model (that's less render time intesive); as well as fix some of their early attempts that they now consider akward).

Again, nothing happens in a vaccum; but understand that if they just shoveled money into; and then waited until all 79 episodes were ready; that would be a long time to wait for any return on investment - this they show them as they complete them and are given a timetable.

Again, the fact CBS IS willing to pony up any cash for this shows that they belive TOS is and will be a marketable commodity for years to come. I think that's a good thing, personally.
 
Noname Given said:
Again, nothing happens in a vaccum; but understand that if they just shoveled money into; and then waited until all 79 episodes were ready; that would be a long time to wait for any return on investment - this they show them as they complete them and are given a timetable.

Who said anything about waiting for all 79 episodes to be finished? That would be silly. All they would really have needed, was a four episode lead. Get four episodes down...iron out as many kinks as possible, but make those first four episodes perfect before looking at the others. It's like anything, you need a solid foundation to build off of...and so far, these guys have no choice to be stumble around blind...and hope to hell the thing holds up. It's no way to work.
 
Ghostface1701 said:
Have I missed something? Why the sudden furore over one little mistake?

Because if you let one mistake go, you can't type that someone "needs to be FIRED!!!!!!!!!"

The Fellowship of the Miserable will not be denied!

Joe, exclaiming!
 
Ghostface1701 said:

And, you're basing that statement on...what, exactly?

The obvious fact that they've been learning as they go from the moment the project started. They had to wait around for a new model to be produced for them, when a period of pre-prep should have revealed this before production even started. A lot of their lighting is extremely poorly executed. They're flying by the seat of their pants...they've said as much themselves.
 
Ghostface1701 said:
shornak said:
Yeah, I get the feeling they are just rushing through these and not taking the time to quality check their work. I mean Mike Okuda has been in Star Trek one way or another since STIV , that's over 20 years. He should know better then to stick a flyby shot in a show when the Enterprise is suppose to be orbiting a planet. Maybe they need to slow down and come out with these every other week or something to give themselves more time to invest in this.

Apparently, the shot in question was mistakenly put in by another company handling the editing of the episode. CBS Digital have already said they're going to fix this for future screenings.

Have I missed something? Why the sudden furore over one little mistake? I thought the new FX have been pretty good so far.

Oh I too think the new visuals look great. I like all of them so far. I just think editing errors like that shouldn't happen.
 
Learning as they go? Not putting a finished, polished product on screen from the get go? Do any of you fanboys/apologists realise the leeway you're giving them?

Time to correct mistakes? Re-finish the work? C'mon, that's amateur hour.

The one thing they have going for them is a host of knowledgeable fans who could form a focus group to see the new work. All they really had to do was get some well-known Star Trek critics or a beta group of 12-20 fans to critique the work before release.

This was done as an investment. Spend money to make money. They didn't throw money at this altruistically. So, they threw money and got substandard garbage. Redoing the ship, the cornerstone of the effects? Why?
Because they did a shit job first time through, and any focus group could have told them that.

CBS amateur hour.

You know, I work on a ridiculous, impossible schedule. So do my coworkers. But we turn out a finished, satisfactory product that doesn't get ripped apart by the very fan base it's made for.
 
Steven Of Nine said:

You know, I work on a ridiculous, impossible schedule. So do my coworkers. But we turn out a finished, satisfactory product that doesn't get ripped apart by the very fan base it's made for.

That's because you don't post it here. :cool:
 
Corran Horn said:
Steven Of Nine said:

You know, I work on a ridiculous, impossible schedule. So do my coworkers. But we turn out a finished, satisfactory product that doesn't get ripped apart by the very fan base it's made for.

That's because you don't post it here. :cool:


:guffaw: :guffaw: :guffaw: :thumbsup: :vulcan:
 
Steven Of Nine said:
CBS amateur hour.

You know, I work on a ridiculous, impossible schedule. So do my coworkers. But we turn out a finished, satisfactory product that doesn't get ripped apart by the very fan base it's made for.

Interesting. Please let me know what show this is, so I can judge it by my own arbitrary standards and so I can rip it apart if the spirit moves me.
 
skylark said:

Interesting. Please let me know what show this is, so I can judge it by my own arbitrary standards and so I can rip it apart if the spirit moves me.

Why should it be a show? T.V. shows aren't the only jobs with tight schedules. I'm a graphic designer. My deadline got pulled out from under me last week, so I had to work 36 hours straight to meet it and maintain the quality...and I did just that. All the clients were more than pleased, and had no idea that I worked under such pressure...nor did I tell my clients that I was under a tight schedule to excuse any poor workmanship...mainly, because there wasn't any. No offense to CBS digital, but the excuses of..'tight schedule...we needed a new model...blah blah', really shouldn't be public knowledge. It's highly unprofessional, and doesn't give me a whole lot of faith in their abilities. Who would want to hire a company that can't do current standard quality work under pressure?
 
I was merely trying to suggest that this person may not work in television and therefore may not understand the realities of the world that he presumes to criticize. Nevertheless, you're absolutely correct about a true professional not making excuses.

EDIT: I'm not suggesting that you have to work in television in order to be qualified to criticize television. But when evaluating someone's opinion, it's useful to ask if that person knows what he or she is talking about. In cases where I suspect that they may be criticizing out of ignorance, I tend to discount their opinions. But that's just my opinion.
 
What specific changes would you like to see? Not defending CBS but what would you like to see done on the completed R-TOS episodes? Be Specific? James R. Kirk WNMHGBF?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top