Read the thread (which you obviously didn't do.)This is the first I am hearing of this lawsuit. So Discovery may be a gigantic ripoff?

Read the thread (which you obviously didn't do.)This is the first I am hearing of this lawsuit. So Discovery may be a gigantic ripoff?
Nah, I'll just ask questions and see if anyone answers.Read the thread (which you obviously didn't do.)![]()
Nope.This is the first I am hearing of this lawsuit. So Discovery may be a gigantic ripoff?
No, some dork who was developing a video game saw some very vague similarities, both his game and Discovery used a giant tradigrade, his teleported itself through space, Discovery's was plugged into the spore drive. He misrepresented some facts to make both projects look more similar than they are and sued, he then tried to prove for months that someone involved with Discovery saw his unfinished ideas and pictures on steam where it was part of a contest or something with thousands of other games in development no ine cared about. He never could and currently everyone's waiting for the judge to dismiss the case.This is the first I am hearing of this lawsuit. So Discovery may be a gigantic ripoff?
No, some dork who was developing a video game saw some very vague similarities...
Cool, thanks for the summary.No, some dork who was developing a video game saw some very vague similarities, both his game and Discovery used a giant tradigrade, his teleported itself through space, Discovery's was plugged into the spore drive. He misrepresented some facts to make both projects look more similar than they are and sued, he then tried to prove for months that someone involved with Discovery saw his unfinished ideas and pictures on steam where it was part of a contest or something with thousands of other games in development no ine cared about. He never could and currently everyone's waiting for the judge to dismiss the case.
Professional Discovery haters on youtube have been egging him on the entire time and are pretending Discovery is somehow in trouble because of the lawsuit, spoiler alert: It's not.
He isn't just wrongly believing, he actively misrepresented characters to make them appear way more similar than they are. I really don't agree there's no reason to call him a dork, he's more than earned that with his behavior like pretending his game was going to be a huge success and highly anticipated ...No real reason to call him a dork, or any other name. Just a man who, probably wrongly, believes someone stole his idea. He isn't the first and won't be the last.
A strong argument. How did the judge not listen to it?The counter to that, it seems, is “It must be true coz Kurtzman sucks”. Sigh.
He also has claimed just the other day in a new video, that the Judge has already ruled in his favor (which hasn't happened) and that CBS has admitted to using his ideas. (which they haven't)He isn't just wrongly believing, he actively misrepresented characters to make them appear way more similar than they are. I really don't agree there's no reason to call him a dork, he's more than earned that with his behavior like pretending his game was going to be a huge success and highly anticipated ...
Wow. That's really all you need to know about the guy.He also has claimed just the other day in a new video, that the Judge has already ruled in his favor (which hasn't happened) and that CBS has admitted to using his ideas. (which they haven't)
![]()
I'm pretty sure that he started out just worrying about whether or not CBS would give him any problems when and if he ever actually published his game.Wow. That's really all you need to know about the guy.
And any decent attorney would tell him to not do anything like that. Which proves he either is not listening to his attorneys or that his attorneys are not very good. Based on what we know, it very well could actually be both.I'm pretty sure that he started out just worrying about whether or not CBS would give him any problems when and if he ever actually published his game.
Something that he's gone completely off the track of, at this time.
(and which is beginning to seem like he will never get to a de facto form)
But at some point he began to actually believe the diatribe from folks who hate DISCOVERY and went off on this tangent of trying to "destroy the evil CBS" with apparently a complete loss of objective thinking.
![]()
The part about the attorneys level of competence, was kinda-sorta already proved by the amount of rookie mistakes and numerous refiling's that have been necessary on their part right from the get go.And any decent attorney would tell him to not do anything like that. Which proves he either is not listening to his attorneys or that his attorneys are not very good. Based on what we know, it very well could actually be both.
Pretty much, I guess. I mean, it's common to ask for much more than you're probably going to get in litigation like this, but not THAT much. It just makes them look, like you say, incompetent and egotistically arrogant.The part about the attorneys level of competence, was kinda-sorta already proved by the amount of rookie mistakes and numerous refiling's that have been necessary on their part right from the get go.
But, charging headlong into claiming that CBS should relinquish all the proceeds from DISCOVERY to Abdin,
as well as abandon the production completely, was the topping on the cake of incompetence and egotistical arrogance.
I guess GO BIG or GO HOME is their business motto.
![]()
I'm no lawyer, but I wonder if there is some esoteric legal point to this...The part about the attorneys level of competence, was kinda-sorta already proved by the amount of rookie mistakes and numerous refiling's that have been necessary on their part right from the get go.
But, charging headlong into claiming that CBS should relinquish all the proceeds from DISCOVERY to Abdin,
as well as abandon the production completely, was the topping on the cake of incompetence and egotistical arrogance.
I guess GO BIG or GO HOME is their business motto.
![]()
That is probably an interesting logical-mind-game to play,I'm no lawyer, but I wonder if there is some esoteric legal point to this...
That is, Abdin's argument is that the story was stolen; therefore, the story is rightfully his. I'm thinking that if he asked for only part of Discovery's proceeds, then the argument from the other side would be "If you really think that CBS stole it, then why do you feel you're only entitled to part instead of all?"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.