Yeah, agreed. It doesn't matter who's involved...public sex just shouldn't be happening. They should've stuck simply to a public indecency/lewd behavior charge that could apply to anyone regardless of orientation.
Caribbean Gay Cruise
- Thread starter Gryffindorian
- Start date
I saw this video the other day. I was reading an article on a website in which the writer claimed the couple purportedly did not admit to having had sex in public. Apparently, there was no mention of their denying it during the interview.
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIgiWu_ANSU[/yt]
P.S. That KTLA David Begnaud is hella cute.
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIgiWu_ANSU[/yt]
P.S. That KTLA David Begnaud is hella cute.
Why not?
Puritanical Christianity is still strong in the Carribean and Africa.
Because that's the sort of thing one should consent beforehand to seeing, not have it foisted on you.
Not a Christian and I don't want to watch anyone's nasty ass wallow around in public whether it be man/woman, man/man, woman/woman (and I love lesbian porn) or man/sandwich.
It's just basic respect for fellow human beings.
Right but I was really referring to the whole "buggery" being illegal thing.
Simplest way to begin to change that is for gay people to quit pumping money into their economy.
So you think its a good idea for minors (never mind adults of all faiths and sexual orientations who think it's disgusting) to witness public sexual intercourse? Most parents would prefer their kids weren't exposed to this type of lewdness. If you take a vacation to Orgy Island in the South Pacific, where the whole two weeks is "fuckin' outdoors under the stars" well then that's another matter. I can avoid that... go bring your own kids and have a ball. But no one wants to see you bumpin' uglies in the entry to Chucky Cheese or in a WalMart parking lot where there are already enough sanitation horrors.
touche'
Hilarious. And the absolute truth.
I noted in another thread that people equate restraint or respect of any kind with religion and run the other way even when common sense dictates otherwise.
I don't think anyone is saying that prosecuting public sex necessarily relates to being too religious.
Agreed, and great post by the way.
I decided to have lunch at a park one day because it was one of the first nice days of spring. I showed up midway through some guy getting blown in his car. While it may have enhanced his hour, it didn't do much for mine.
I should be able to avoid it, not have it forced upon me. If you want to go to swinger's camp and have a weekend full of arcing ropes of jism shooting to and fro, go right ahead. Not at the town park please.
Look away.
As for doing it al fresco, for me it totally depends. Here in the U.S. (and in most countries, I assume) it's considered illegal. I certainly wouldn't want to subject little kids (I have nephews and nieces) to that kind of scene. But if it's a private resort or residence in a remote location (e.g., mountain, beach), anything goes.
Suppose you see a bunch of people pissing in the streets. Hey, it would save money, you don't need public toilets. And if you are annoyed by the pissers, just look away.
I hope you see now the problem with the argument that having sex in public where everybody can see you is no big deal. And no, prudery and common decency aren't the same thing. I am all for people fu*king their brains out but not out on the streets.
Or they could be grown ups and go someplace private instead of a public park where there could be children playing. Or heaven forbid, people trying to eat lunch and enjoy the day.
You could at least provide a link to their tourism website.
