Actually, per the dialogue:
TROI: They're our allies now, Mister Worf. We have to trust them.
I always wondered about Troi's line. Did they have a peace treaty or an actual alliance? I find them being allies a stretch
Actually, per the dialogue:
TROI: They're our allies now, Mister Worf. We have to trust them.
In Journey's End, Picard said "Evek, the last war caused massive destruction and cost millions of lives." Now unless the millions of lives were exclusively Cardassians during the course of the war, the Federation would have lost their share of people, and some of those would be from Starfleet who were the ones fighting the Cardassians.
How portion of these "millions of lifes" would have been people from the Federation?
And how many were Starfleet personnel?
I personally reject the notion that some fans have that Starfleet could just walked all over the Cardassians in combat. The war (hot and cold) went on for multiple years and Starfleet was seemingly incapable of simply winning it swiftly. And the war ended in a treaty that neither side was completely happy about.
So I don't think the death and destruction would have all been on one side (the Cardassians).
Starfleet would have lost hundreds of starships, while the newer starships would be superior to the average Cardassian ships, many (the majority) of Starfleet's starships were Excelsiors and other older starships, and would have been more evenly matched.
In some cases Starfleet's starships would be inferior to their Cardassian opponents.
Federation member worlds would be attacked, colonies too, hundreds of thousands killed.
The Cardassians of course would also lose ships and have their planets attacked by Starfleet.
How would you see the "millions of lives" being divided?
I'm not seeing that. In The Wounded, the Cardassians were outmatched handily. Later, in DS9's The Emmissary, the Cardassians were particularly concerned about Starfleet's return to Bajor even knowing their own Fourth Order would arrive in about the same timeframe.
So 950,000+ Cardassians died, and 50,000+ Federali?I think the cost of "millions of lives" may have been somewhat exaggerated -- not in actual number, but in implied effect. For the audience, millions dead sounds absolutely catastrophic, but if we take into account the sheer magnitude of the Federation (twenty years after the war, during First Contact, Picard says it includes more than 150 worlds), and it begins to sound a lot more like a planetary dispute or border skirmish than an all out interstellar war.
And perhaps Captain Picard was dramatizing a bit as well. Maybe it's because of his moral position that all life is valuable, or maybe it's something like post-9/11 America in which losses of fewer than 10,000 (on 9/11, and in both Iraq and Afghanistan) are regarded as absolutely epic tragedies by contemporary citizens.
Why do you reject the notion? I'm sorry for continuing the comparison, but it seems too well suited. In 2003, allied forces took Iraq apart in a few weeks, but the conflict officially raged for eight years more (and arguably continues to this day) until it ended in a way that very few were actually happy about.
Given the size of the Federation compared to the Cardiassian Union, the resources, and so on, it seems particularly believable to me that the UFP would be perfectly capable of defeating the Cardassians if it so chose. But that it chose instead to exercise restraint in an effort to minimize casualties, avoid getting into a costly occupation, and so on...
I'm not seeing that. In The Wounded, the Cardassians were outmatched handily. Later, in DS9's The Emmissary, the Cardassians were particularly concerned about Starfleet's return to Bajor even knowing their own Fourth Order would arrive in about the same timeframe.
I suppose you could argue that older ships would be more of a match for the Cardassians, I would suggest -- unlike the Dominion War that actually taxed the might of the Federation -- there would have been little reason to send more vulnerable designs into the combat zone.
Granted.
Except in cases of an all out war for survival -- which I don't think this was as I've noted above several times -- I just can't imagine Starfleet bombarding planets and indiscriminately killing civilians. I'm sure they took out plenty of orbital stations and surface power and weapons systems, but nothing like the scale we seem to be discussing.
I'm going to say 20 to 1.
Let's remember that the "Starfleet reinforcements" that Jasad was worried about was one ship (okay, the Enterprise, but still) whereas if "The Seventh Order" is three ships, then the "Fourth Order" is likely to be at least as many, suggesting that Jasad wasn't comformatable with six-to-one odds or better.
So 950,000+ Cardassians died, and 50,000+ Federali?
And from there, O'Brien's backstory gets Amplified. He's the hero of Setlik III, a hardened soldier, and...The Cardy war feels like it's there just to make this one episode work... by making Miles angry with Cardassians.
It's even worse than that with O'Brien. She intruded on his private thoughts (Which probably hold Cardassians unfavorably) & then shamed him, not for being unfriendly or rude, but simply for having an errant damn emotion. Come on! Give him a break, you thought policing social attack dog. They butchered children in front of him. He's entitled to an unpleasant stray thought or 2It's a ridiculous line. She acts like a red army political commissar in that episode. She later shames O'Brien in the transporter room with a villainous disapproving glare because he wasn't very friendly with the Cardies.
The episode itself proves Worf correct-that they aren't to be trusted.
It's even worse than that with O'Brien. She intruded on his private thoughts (Which probably hold Cardassians unfavorably) & then shamed him, not for being unfriendly or rude, but simply for having an errant damn emotion. Come on! Give him a break, you thought policing social attack dog. They butchered children in front of him. He's entitled to an unpleasant stray thought or 2
I find it hard to believe that someone who counsels uniformed officers could possibly be so dim, as to expect constant blissful harmony in war veterans.
If he'd said it, yeah. Saying something is a choice, an act. An errant thought is far less voluntary, & she did shame him. His last look is a look of shame, as he breaks eye contact & tucks his head down, redirecting back at his console. (Oops! Busted). She stared him down, until he showed shame. Which was apparently sufficient, because she then just walks off, content in the knowledge that her gaze had gotten the message across, that the stuff she'd gleaned with her brain ray was wrong & he was wrong for thinking it, even if only fleetingly.She didn't stand there accusing him of anything, or shaming him - she just reacted in shock to "hearing" what was probably quite a vicious thought from a guy who is normally jovial and friendly. It's out of character, and you'd probably stare at a friend - who is typically open and companionable - who suddenly spat out a "let all the fuckers die!".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.