• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Carbon-free fusion power could be ‘on the grid in 15 years’

I remember people theorising ways of making a thermonuclear device that didn't require a fission stage back in the 70s. If anything came of it, I doubt we'd be told. It went quiet in the 80s - because it was impractical or perhaps not?

The Teller-Ulam design is the current public peak of nuclear weapons design, and many nations concluded that it would do what it needed to do - make the other side gone. Why spend time on the creation of a fusion weapon when you don't need it?

A pure fusion weapon would require the miniaturization of something like a pulse-powered or laser confinement system, which with all publicly known technology isn't possible. If such a thing was developed trying it out would violate the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which although not in force is mostly adhered to.

Some say that laser confinement research violates that, I happen not to agree. If anyone ever mastered fusion power, the knowledge of the pure fusion bomb would come with it. That's the same with pretty much any cheap, abundant source of power though as energy is a topic with an inherently military dimension.
 
Yeah, I don't recall the details - it was probably some sort of proposal for an inertial confinement system.

Here are recent vides from Sabine Hossenfelder on the prospects for stellarators:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

and muon-catalysed fusion with an interesting discussion of how laser wake-field acceleration can be used to produce the required muons:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
The Teller-Ulam design is the current public peak of nuclear weapons design, and many nations concluded that it would do what it needed to do - make the other side gone. Why spend time on the creation of a fusion weapon when you don't need it?

A pure fusion weapon would require the miniaturization of something like a pulse-powered or laser confinement system, which with all publicly known technology isn't possible. If such a thing was developed trying it out would violate the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which although not in force is mostly adhered to.

Some say that laser confinement research violates that, I happen not to agree. If anyone ever mastered fusion power, the knowledge of the pure fusion bomb would come with it. That's the same with pretty much any cheap, abundant source of power though as energy is a topic with an inherently military dimension.
there are some who think that's essentially, along with other weapons tests, what National Ignition Facility was for, skirting those rules while modelling real time.
 
That kind of fusion would be better for propulsion.

A simple BB gun shoots out the back—maybe lasers reflect off a hemispherical reflector towards a foci right where the pellet is—it goes off like a mini Orion pulse unit…
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top