^I love it that doing female-led shorts like Item 47 and Agent Carter is meant to try to build audience demand for a female-led feature. I just wish they'd show the shorts in theaters!
So, the "Jame Bond" theory?It would be interesting if "Nick Fury" is just a name the various heads of S.H.I.E.L.D. have used over the years. Perhaps Jackson's character has not really lost an eye. Its really a visual interface device and a tribute to a predecessor and giving the wrong impression of a limitation.
So, the "Jame Bond" theory?It would be interesting if "Nick Fury" is just a name the various heads of S.H.I.E.L.D. have used over the years. Perhaps Jackson's character has not really lost an eye. Its really a visual interface device and a tribute to a predecessor and giving the wrong impression of a limitation.
Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of using them as DVD bonus features to get more people interested in buying them?I just wish they'd show the shorts in theaters!
There were black men (entire units even) in combat during WWII, especially in the latter half of the war. They just weren't in white units.In The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes, it was Nick Fury's father Jack Fury who was a member of the Howling Commandos. No explanation how a black man could've been in combat in WWII, but then, it was an alternate history where WWII was fought against HYDRA rather than the Nazis.
Come to think of it, didn't Gabe Jones appear in Captain America: The First Avenger? So there's precedent in the MCU.
No explanation how a black man could've been in combat in WWII
Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of using them as DVD bonus features to get more people interested in buying them?I just wish they'd show the shorts in theaters!
There were black men (entire units even) in combat during WWII, especially in the latter half of the war. They just weren't in white units.
How is "unfair" to create additional content for people willing to pay more?Yes, it would, and that is one reason I wish it would happen. I don't think it's fair that those of us who can't afford to buy BluRays on a regular basis, who are limited to theater tickets or rentals or streaming or On Demand, have to be deprived of the opportunity to see these shorts.
How will we know when to silence our cell phones?Part of the reason I wish they'd show them in theaters is that it would be cool. It used to be normal to show short subjects before movies in the theater, but now it's vanishingly rare -- only Pixar really seems to make theatrical shorts anymore. And that's a shame, because it's cool to get a bonus before the movie. At least it's better than an endless barrage of commercials and trailers.
No way they will show the shorts in the theaters, to much money lost that way. By the end of the viewing day you would lose a whole showtime.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.