"Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new movie

[Superman]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

^^^Well, this is all we can expect from the intellectual likes of Dennis Bailey.

Hopefully, two closed threads will send home the message that he needs to stop this crap.

\S/

 

[Therin of Andor]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

No love for the NBC peacock?

 

[Jack Bauer]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Funny thread.

 

[Samuel T. Cogley]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Glad to see that Dennis' threads are getting as many humorless, crabby, pissy posters as my threads usually get. I was starting to feel singled out and lonely.

 

[StarMan]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Superman said:
^^^Well, this is all we can expect from the intellectual likes of Dennis Bailey.

Hopefully, two closed threads will send home the message that he needs to stop this crap.

\S/

Because *your* thread got closed, everyone else's should. Got it.

 

[gastrof]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Therin of Andor said:
No love for the NBC peacock?

Baked or fried?

 

[Jon1701]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Samuel T. Cogley said:
I have it on good authority that any feature films set in the Mirror Universe will be produced by "Good Robot"

 

[CommanderRaytas]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

I think we need more funny threads like this one... people, you need to relax.

 

[moonman]

other than the "you trekkies" comment, i would assume that if you are posting here than you are a trekkie to some extent, you are on the money. thank you. this is the very hyper focused critisism that fosters the uber geek image.

stop the madness...

this message was in response to brutal strudel's take.

 

[Brutal Strudel]

I rtather think you misunderstood me, right down to my satirical use of "you trekkies," which was meant to underscore the...

Oh, never mind.

Go, Star Trek XI!

 

[USS Mariner]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Dennis, you're not quite as bad as Alain, but you're trying your damnedest.

 

[Squiggy]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Starship Polaris said:
It's basically an animation of a cute little floppy robot running around through some high grass. I don't know why it's running; maybe that scary "I Am Legend" monster from the Mutant Enemy logo is chasing it.

Every time you masturbate, God kills a Bad Robot.

That's what it sounds like.

 

[Jackson_Roykirk]

Dayton Ward said:
Well, Nomad was a bad robot. Does that help?

Hey - Watch it! My namesake resents that remark!

 

[Woulfe]

Mad Robot ?

Let loose the CANNONS !

- W -
* AaaaaaaaaaaRrrrrrrrrr *

 

[Gepard]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

Superman said:
^^^Well, this is all we can expect from the intellectual likes of Dennis Bailey.

Hopefully, two closed threads will send home the message that he needs to stop this crap.

\S/

...and yet, somehow, the thread remains open.

I, for one, think it's funny.

Starship Polaris said:
Plus, it's a CGI robot - doesn't look a thing like a real goofy robot. Only a bunch of punk kids who have destroyed their vision by shooting up their retinas with ecstasy every day since primary school could accept this obviously phony effect.

Look on the bright side--at least the robot isn't being welded together! Because that would be unacceptable. I, for one, think Trek has been robotless for far too long, and if the new robot crewman is small and cute, all the better. But if Fred Willard appears in live action, I'm boycotting.

 

[Cyke101]

scotthm said:

Starship Polaris said:
This violates canon on two fronts.

Not at all.

It's just a commercial for a production company, that just happens to be the production company of the new movie, and just happens to play immediately before the new movie starts.

---------------

Somewhere, a baby starship lost its nacelles...

 

[Dayton Ward]

Jackson_Roykirk said:
Hey - Watch it! My namesake resents that remark!

Okay, maybe not bad. Misunderstood, perhaps?

 

[Woulfe]

WAITASECOND !

Doesn't it also mean that there are stars in a simi-circle around a mountain with the words Paramount in this film as well if we're to take everything in the teaser as gospel ?

- W -
* Smirks *

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Woulfe said:
WAITASECOND !

Doesn't it also mean that there are stars in a simi-circle around a mountain with the words Paramount in this film as well if we're to take everything in the teaser as gospel ?

- W -
* Smirks *

Well, there are such things in the "Star Trek Universe."

 

[Superman]

Re: "Canon" problem with the opening sequence of the new mov

StarMan said:

Superman said:
^^^Well, this is all we can expect from the intellectual likes of Dennis Bailey.

Hopefully, two closed threads will send home the message that he needs to stop this crap.

\S/

Because *your* thread got closed, everyone else's should. Got it.

No, Ted. That's not the case.

Bailey already had a similarly crappy thread shut down.

I was hoping the same would happen here.

\S/