The shot of the severed arm on the cantina floor was added specifically to get the PG rating."G" films in 1979 did not have the stigma they do today. It was suitable for family viewing, not that TMP was necessarily terribly entertaining for some kids.
Probably so. But it's interesting that the MPAA was ready to give Star Wars a G rating in 1977, but 20th Century Fox pushed for PG because they thought G would be seen as "un-cool" by the teen audience.
--Justin
TMP's Billy Van Zandt (the Rhaandarite ensign) was also in "Jaws 2". During filming, he got to do two final scenes: getting eaten by the shark and getting washed up onto the rocks. His was the pivotal death scene that would have kicked the film into an "R" rating. Because the film was about teenagers, the movie needed to be "M", not "R", otherwise no teenagers could see the movie with their Friday night dates. So Bob Burnside got to live! The studio complied with classification guidelines to scrape into "M", rather than be labeled an "R".
You mean "PG" instead of "M", right? I believe "M" was discontinued by early 1970.
In Australia we have M. Here it goes G - PG - M - MA - R. I don't understand the US system at all, so I have no idea how it corresponds.
You mean "PG" instead of "M", right? I believe "M" was discontinued by early 1970.
For those interested, according to the wiki article for Jaws 2, which scenes needed to be deleted to assure its rating in the states are described in The Making of Jaws 2, on the Jaws 2 DVD.
You mean "PG" instead of "M", right? I believe "M" was discontinued by early 1970.
Sorry, "M" was still in use in Australia.
The shot of the severed arm on the cantina floor was added specifically to get the PG rating.
My statement was correct, only unclear as to its context.
My statement was correct, only unclear as to its context.
And my "sorry" was me apologizing for assuming that "M" still applied in the US in the 70s. As I said, "M" was a very common film rating here, Down Under, all through the 70s and 80s.
I had seen most of TOS already, and looking back at it, the revealing costumes worn by the women were more sexual than anything in TMP.
G seems a little off the mark, but as an 11 year old seeing TMP in the theater, the sexual stuff just went right past me. The transporter accident was quick, and not all that graphic, and didn't bother me at all.
By the time TMP came out I had seen most of TOS already, and looking back at it, the revealing costumes worn by the women were more sexual than anything in TMP.
What's interesting in Australia is that, during the 70s, when TOS was building its huge US cross-generational audience in stripped, syndicated, prime time repeats, TOS was unable to be so stripped Down Under because our censors had been rather tough on it in the 60s. 40 episodes were rated "G" and 38 received the 70s TV equivalent of "PG" ("NRC", or "Not Recommended for Children"), so the whole series was not easily slotted into kids' viewing times.
...the original lines:
Boy: "She's got tits like a sparrow."
Bob Burnside: "Do you have to talk like that?"
I don't understand the "G" rating in TMP as opposed to the "PG" in the other classic Trek films. The distinction appears to be arbitrary.
Then again, film ratings are so absurd that graphic, ultra-violent disgusting films can't get worse than an "R," but an erect penis can send a film into NC-17 territory.
I find graphic violence to be more disturbing than bare skin, but hey, that's just me.
I took the original post as implying that fans today looking back on TMP find it laughable that it bore a "kiddie" rating. Which is possible, given that the G rating has come to be considerably devalued and largely supplanted by PG in the ensuing decades. However, I agree that I've never actually heard anyone "snickering" about its G rating, literally or figuratively.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.