"Star Trek" (XI) production cost around $150 million and its in theater gross was $385 million surpassing the box office gross and number of tickets sold by previous films benchmarks made by "The Motion Picture" and "IV - The Voyage Home" but can JJ Abrams and his production replicate the success of the first film (XI)?
We all know Star Trek was presumed dead by Paramount and TV exec's after Star Trek Nemesis bombed at the box office followed by the cancellation of "Enterprise" in 2005, one producer even infamously stated that Trek would be dead for at least ten years while the franchise rested, yet "Star Trek" (XI) was the biggest Trek success to date but has Star Trek really come back?
Star Trek's twelfth film is due in 2011 with Abrams, Orci, and Kurtzman busily brainstorming the script which they plan to submit to paramount by Christmas and production due to start some time late in the spring. From the recent interviews with Orci and Kurtzman they have stated two important factors that they prefer quality so expect don't lots of back to back Trek films being produced, and they won't retread the paths of other scripts IE rehash old stories because only the die-hards would appreciate that, if they revisit old characters they want to create new experiences for movie viewers with those characters. To me this is both wise and more fascinating because it means that Star Trek can stay fresh and alive but...
...That doesn't mean they will necessarily replicate the success of their first film, they could do everything right even satisfy the Trekkies/Trekkers but that still won't guarantee success for the next two films, worse yet they could alienate the die-hard fans and still fail at the box office killing Trek probably for good. Star Trek hasn't arrived yet not until we see XII and XIII in theaters so can they do it, can they truly bring Star Trek back to a to life as a thriving franchise? Or is this the twilight hour for our beloved Star Trek?


We all know Star Trek was presumed dead by Paramount and TV exec's after Star Trek Nemesis bombed at the box office followed by the cancellation of "Enterprise" in 2005, one producer even infamously stated that Trek would be dead for at least ten years while the franchise rested, yet "Star Trek" (XI) was the biggest Trek success to date but has Star Trek really come back?
Star Trek's twelfth film is due in 2011 with Abrams, Orci, and Kurtzman busily brainstorming the script which they plan to submit to paramount by Christmas and production due to start some time late in the spring. From the recent interviews with Orci and Kurtzman they have stated two important factors that they prefer quality so expect don't lots of back to back Trek films being produced, and they won't retread the paths of other scripts IE rehash old stories because only the die-hards would appreciate that, if they revisit old characters they want to create new experiences for movie viewers with those characters. To me this is both wise and more fascinating because it means that Star Trek can stay fresh and alive but...
...That doesn't mean they will necessarily replicate the success of their first film, they could do everything right even satisfy the Trekkies/Trekkers but that still won't guarantee success for the next two films, worse yet they could alienate the die-hard fans and still fail at the box office killing Trek probably for good. Star Trek hasn't arrived yet not until we see XII and XIII in theaters so can they do it, can they truly bring Star Trek back to a to life as a thriving franchise? Or is this the twilight hour for our beloved Star Trek?


