• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Bryan Singer developing a remake of Excalibur

Bryan Singer is usually very involved in the writing of his films as a supervisor. Reading comments from collaborators Dan Harris and Michael Dougherty, a normal day working for Bryan Singer as a writer consists of coming into the office at 9am, writing until 5pm, while Singer periodically throughout the day looks over what you have written and critiques it as you're writing it. So in that respect he's very involved thematically speaking with all of his films, and as Out Of My Vulcan Mind points out, very involved in a producing capacity as well.

I've resigned myself to the fact that he'll never return to the two projects I want to see him return most to: something X-Men related (whether that would be directing X-Men: First Class, X-Men Origins: Magneto or Wolverine 2... or X4) and the next chapter in the Superman universe. While I am heavily excited over his involvement as producer and hopefully director of the planned Battlestar Galactica film, and Excalibur certainly sounds interesting, I kind of wish Singer would either do something like X-Men or Superman or do something original like The Usual Suspects or Valkyrie. I especially feel like his mark on the X-Men and Superman films feels cinematically unfinished... Like he has more to say with both concepts. Too bad we'll likely never see what he has (possibly) left to say.
 
Some plot macguffins of the film are accurate. They're just put together ahistorically.

Germanus of Auxerre did undertake a mission to Britain in 429 CE to root out the Pelagian heresy. But by that point, there would have been no Sarmatian cavalry in Britain, as the Romans had already withdrawn in 410. (Wikipedia places the film in 467 CE, which would be well beyond Germanus' mission, not to mention the Roman evacuation of Britain.)

Cerdic, also historical, didn't invade Britain until 495 CE.

Despite those problems, I don't mind. One thing about the Arthurian mythos is that it can take on elements from lots of sources and meld them into something coherent. The film, while not historical (as the film's trailers promised), was, for me, genuinely entertaining.
 
Fair enough. For one breathtaking moment I thought you meant it wasn't historical from an Arthurian POV. You can understand how I made that mistake, given the subject of the thread.
 
Ditto. And I just gagged over warrior-woman, tribal-painted Guinevere. I mean come on. Can't they ever remake a classic true to the time period, without trying to make a female character a rip-off of today's strong woman=man with tits caricature?

Wait... there was a woman with tits in Clive Owen's King Arthur movie?!?!? Where?

Failed reading comprehension in school, huh?
 
Ditto. And I just gagged over warrior-woman, tribal-painted Guinevere. I mean come on. Can't they ever remake a classic true to the time period, without trying to make a female character a rip-off of today's strong woman=man with tits caricature?

Wait... there was a woman with tits in Clive Owen's King Arthur movie?!?!? Where?

Failed reading comprehension in school, huh?

Failed humor appreciation in life, eh?
 
I wonder if they will use the same "Charm of Making" that was used in the original movie? Analnakthrac ustud vestud dorkyay teinvay - or something like this.
 
Did she point out that the armor was 1,000 years ahead of its time, and Monty Python had more accurate costuming?

The armor was left over from Boorman's planned "Lord of the Rings", which did not live long. Fortunately.

I did not know that!

I wonder if they will use the same "Charm of Making" that was used in the original movie? Analnakthrac ustud vestud dorkyay teinvay - or something like this.


Anahl Nathrach!
Oothvass Bethoud!
Dochiel Dienveh!

(Made up spelling, but phonetically, that's it).
 
All anyone hears of Carmina Burana is the starting/finishing chorus. I like the drinking song from the taverna. Also there's a womyn having an orgasm in it.
 
Yeah, but Carmina Burina is used so effectively with that one scene, The grail is found, the land is regaining it's vitality, and a restored Arthur is leading his Knights into battle once more.

Sheer movie magic, I tell ya. :)
 
Yeah, but Carmina Burina is used so effectively with that one scene, The grail is found, the land is regaining it's vitality, and a restored Arthur is leading his Knights into battle once more.

Sheer movie magic, I tell ya. :)

unfortunately O' Fortuna (the piece from Carmina Burana) has now become one of the most abused pieces of music going around.
 
Yeah, but Carmina Burina is used so effectively with that one scene, The grail is found, the land is regaining it's vitality, and a restored Arthur is leading his Knights into battle once more.

Sheer movie magic, I tell ya. :)

unfortunately O' Fortuna (the piece from Carmina Burana) has now become one of the most abused pieces of music going around.

They should use the Apotheosis dance version, just to be different.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top