It’s been a long road, getting from there to here. It may yet be a long time…but I have (what is it?) ‘faith of the heart’ that we can reach any Star on our Trek.
Sir this is a Brian Brophy Wendy's
"Sir, this is a Brophy's."
Brian has dropped all his planned teaching in order to retrieve Chuck Norris from the afterlife.
Just don't look back.
B 4 Brophy, of course.
The age of uncivilized heathens.
Every single Star Trek series of the modern era has either ended or is scheduled to.
I have tried to find some correlation.
Is it because they include Robert Picardo? No. Only two series of the streaming era have Picardo in them. They succeeded as much as they did because of him. But he couldn't do it alone
Is it because they have Peck-Spock in them. No. Speck only appears in 3 series if you count Short Treks which you should.
But look at who isn't in every single series? I can only come to the reasonable conclusion that Paramount purposefully killed Star Trek by not hiring Brian Brophy, who would have gloriously filled the roles of
DISCO: flashback young Michael Burnham
SHORT TREK: even younger Michael Burnham
PIC: Really.. do I even need to say it? Yes obviously the character A'lison P'ill who was played by the notoriously hard to work with Agnes Jurati, instead.
SNW: Either Kirk, possibly both at the same time. Not many can carry that kind of thing off but Brian (I feel comfortable enough talking about him on a first name basis) can.
LD: I see him more as playing every major visiting character of the week. As this is animated, no one would know. But they would enjoy.
PRO: Janeway-Jack Ransom transporter accident I call Jansome. It's all in my 400 page fan novel "Less Than Zero, More Than One" which is mostly footnotes and a brief epic in the style of the Aeneid.
SFA: Maddox. Given enough time SFA would have brought back someone from every 80-to-90's show so why not do it right from the get go? The show was supposedly designed to appeal to younger people and yet there wasn't even a callback to Brian Brophy.
SCOUTS: no.
I have tried to find some correlation.
Is it because they include Robert Picardo? No. Only two series of the streaming era have Picardo in them. They succeeded as much as they did because of him. But he couldn't do it alone
Is it because they have Peck-Spock in them. No. Speck only appears in 3 series if you count Short Treks which you should.
But look at who isn't in every single series? I can only come to the reasonable conclusion that Paramount purposefully killed Star Trek by not hiring Brian Brophy, who would have gloriously filled the roles of
DISCO: flashback young Michael Burnham
SHORT TREK: even younger Michael Burnham
PIC: Really.. do I even need to say it? Yes obviously the character A'lison P'ill who was played by the notoriously hard to work with Agnes Jurati, instead.
SNW: Either Kirk, possibly both at the same time. Not many can carry that kind of thing off but Brian (I feel comfortable enough talking about him on a first name basis) can.
LD: I see him more as playing every major visiting character of the week. As this is animated, no one would know. But they would enjoy.
PRO: Janeway-Jack Ransom transporter accident I call Jansome. It's all in my 400 page fan novel "Less Than Zero, More Than One" which is mostly footnotes and a brief epic in the style of the Aeneid.
SFA: Maddox. Given enough time SFA would have brought back someone from every 80-to-90's show so why not do it right from the get go? The show was supposedly designed to appeal to younger people and yet there wasn't even a callback to Brian Brophy.
SCOUTS: no.
This is deplorable! Reprehensible! Heinously criminal! Kurtzman deserves to not only be fired, but also blacklisted and prevented from ever again being allowed to work in Hollywood, Toronto, Vancouver and anywhere else any legitimate filmmaking is allowed to be done. And then, he needs to stand trial and answer for what his negligence has done to the Trek franchise. And that's only the beginning!!!
