what ever we get i think it needs to take a darker and grittier turn
The problem with doing a Section 31 series is that Section 31 is a criminal organization, and criminals don't make the best choice for heroes in a TV show.
Yeah, sure, you can make them noble criminals and explore the gray area of doing horrible things for the right reasons. But be honest, you're not going to find that level of complexity in Abrams Trek.
And before anyone suggest it, a series about Starfleet Intelligence would just be catering to a niche market. Hell, any Trek series is targeting a niche market, but Starfleet Intelligence is a niche within a niche. That's not very promising.
I got the impression from STID that in the JJ verse Section 31 was known, but black ops group within Starfleet. You could easily make it a spy series.
We should merge this with the Harry Mudd thread. If they do a new TV series, Harry Mudd is a must have. Along with Gary Mitchell, the Horta, the Doomsday Machine, Salt Vampire, and every other stock TOS staple us fans are going to demand.
It seemed a dire enough prospect five and a half years ago, when spy photos from the Lebec Energy Facility location shoot popped up on AICN. People saw the industrial setting and the not-so-shiny-looking shuttlecraft and were horrified, immediately forecasting doom, gloom, and a "dark and gritty" starship Enterprise. As one poster summed it up:what ever we get i think it needs to take a darker and grittier turn
Dark and gritty is overrated. I don't hate the concept, and certainly don't want things to be overly optimistic and utopian, but dark and gritty is becoming too much of a buzz word than anything meaningful.
Leave it to Star Trek fans to act as if some dirt on the floor of a fictional, 23rd century shuttlecraft is the cinematic equivalent of a human rights violation.
... criminals don't make the best choice for heroes in a TV show.
... criminals don't make the best choice for heroes in a TV show.
I refer you to "Breaking Bad." Although, that being said, this premise wouldn't work for anything else, especially Trek.
CBS is making heaps from Star Trek re-runs and merchandising without spending any money on new episodes (or their Star Trek website) so whats their motivation for a new series?
CBS is making heaps from Star Trek re-runs and merchandising without spending any money on new episodes (or their Star Trek website) so whats their motivation for a new series?
More money. Besides, that same argument can be used against doing another Trek movie.
CBS is making heaps from Star Trek re-runs and merchandising without spending any money on new episodes (or their Star Trek website) so whats their motivation for a new series?
More money. Besides, that same argument can be used against doing another Trek movie.
CBS doesn't make the movies, they collect a fee from Paramount.
More money. Besides, that same argument can be used against doing another Trek movie.
CBS doesn't make the movies, they collect a fee from Paramount.
The argument can still be used against Paramount doing another movie. "Well, why should we? We're still making money off TWOK 30 years later. And that one with the whales."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.