J
Jetfire
Guest
^
That is cool.
That is cool.

I've long been an advocate against form over function. I know most engineers are, but I take it to the extreme. I believe nothing should be designed for aesthetics and the only thing that matters is function.
You two, on the other hand, are sucking all the joy from my exhaust vents.I want a utilitarian SUV-type of vehicle that is built from interchangable parts (e.g., if a single bolt size can conceivably work for multiple applications with a little tweaking, there'd be no reason to use two different bolt sizes). The vehicle should be designed to be as user-accessible as possible for shade tree repairs. Nothing should be buried under 5 other parts so that a 5 minute repair to replace a sensor requires 4 hours to access it.
One color only. Everything is bolted on and no plastic clips. Standard maintenance tasks should be possible to be done in an hour or less with basic hand tools and minimal training. Wiring should be accessible by opening a panel, not by ripping out interior panels and upholstry. Electrical wire gauge should be larger than the minimum requirements. The vehicle should be built with a high enough wheel base that you don't need to jack it up to work under it.
The same model will be made for at least a decade, with no cutesy upgrades to raise costs between years. Save development money where possible by using parts from other vehicles (that meet the quality standards). Simple, rugged, reliable, and easy to fix when it's broke. The ultimate triumph of function over form.
The Pontiac Aztek had function over form and look how well it's selling.
And it's a chunky, less-sexy ripoff of the 25-year-old
1983 GM "Lean Machine":
http://www.maxmatic.com/ttw_leanmachine.htm
![]()
Fascinating machine, I wonder why nothing ever came of it?
Nobody wants an ugly car. It's really that simple.
Back when I was carshopping, the Pontiac RAV4 was the top rated small SUV in Consumer Reports. However, it was also an ugly piece of crap. No way would I buy it. (Plus the controls were shit, it was uncomfortable to sit in, and the people who ran the dealership were total dicks.)
Nobody wants an ugly car. It's really that simple.
Back when I was carshopping, the Pontiac RAV4 was the top rated small SUV in Consumer Reports. However, it was also an ugly piece of crap. No way would I buy it. (Plus the controls were shit, it was uncomfortable to sit in, and the people who ran the dealership were total dicks.)
Toyota RAV4. I too think they're ugly, and they also have a tailgate that belongs in the 1980s.
Henry Ford produced a vehicle like you describe from 1908 to 1927. It was called the Model T.I want a utilitarian SUV-type of vehicle that is built from interchangable parts (e.g., if a single bolt size can conceivably work for multiple applications with a little tweaking, there'd be no reason to use two different bolt sizes). The vehicle should be designed to be as user-accessible as possible for shade tree repairs. Nothing should be buried under 5 other parts so that a 5 minute repair to replace a sensor requires 4 hours to access it.
One color only. Everything is bolted on and no plastic clips. Standard maintenance tasks should be possible to be done in an hour or less with basic hand tools and minimal training. Wiring should be accessible by opening a panel, not by ripping out interior panels and upholstry. Electrical wire gauge should be larger than the minimum requirements. The vehicle should be built with a high enough wheel base that you don't need to jack it up to work under it.
The same model will be made for at least a decade, with no cutesy upgrades to raise costs between years. Save development money where possible by using parts from other vehicles (that meet the quality standards). Simple, rugged, reliable, and easy to fix when it's broke. The ultimate triumph of function over form.
More like a 60-year-old concept. Does no one remember the BMW Isetta and the Messerschmitt bubble car?. . . Yea, this. BMW has just come up with an uglier version of 25 year old technology.
Spoken like a true Italian!. . . You two, on the other hand, are sucking all the joy from my exhaust vents.![]()
The Rav 4 -- is that the SUV for rabbis?I'm surprised you didn't say the Yankee RAV4.
^the Can-Am Spyder? http://www.gizmag.com/go/6823/
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.