• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Blu-Ray just not "catching on"

...In fact the market is struggle so much that analyst predict you can pick up a player for $199.00 by Christmas time...
I can only say what's stopping us: and that is it. We bought a Toshiba HD player for Heroes and TOS first season in HD. When they lost, my husband said no blu-ray until it's under $200 bucks. That's all he paid for the Toshiba; and in fact, he figured the blu-rays would be under $200 by Christmas. It's kind of a magic number, I guess. (The HD player upconverts regular DVD's nicely; we don't use the previous players anymore. It's still worth it.)
 
I'm just going to stop trying to convince people. All I'll say is that Blu-Ray = teh reeelee reelee good.
It's not a question of whether it's really good or not. I think everyone will agree that it's an improvement over DVDs.

It's just a question of whether it's worth the investment, and for a lot of people, it's not.

I agree completely with this.
 
A Blu-ray player can be had starting at a couple of hundred dollars and like I said if you don't want to replace existing DVDs there is no reason too. Of course if you're talking about the HDTV in that "several thousand dollars" don't buy a blu-ray until (or if) you buy an HD set.
Exactly, I'd need to buy a large screen HD TV in order to make any difference to begin with. So I include a BS HD TV as part of the Blue Ray set-up.

If you think the disc pricing is a concern go to Amazon or whatever online source you use to get DVDs and compare pricing. The price difference is not as great as some would have you believe.

How many classic television shows are even on blue ray? Aside from Trek, that is. I'd say 95% of my DVD's do not have a blue ray equivalent.
 
Now before anyone starts attacking with the whole Xbox 360/HD-DVD PS3/Blu-ray stuff hear me out.

I heard on the radio that Blu-ray is not catching fire like they thought it would after HD-DVD went away.
In fact the market is struggle so much that analyst predict you can pick up a player for $199.00 by Christmas time.

That said some co-workers and I were discussing it and mostly agree.

"We are not ready to got out and start replacing our current DVD collection to technology that may have a new rival in a few months for all we know."

I found a pretty good article on it if anyone is interested.

I agree with pretty much the whole thing with the exception that there is a minute difference between Blu-Ray and DVD.

http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /...failing-in-the-wrong-place-at-the-wrong-time/


Discuss.

Blu-Ray is expensive and unnecessary. Its not all that of an upgrade over regular dvds. The industry needs to get back back to us when holographic video recordings become possible.
 
Blu-Ray is expensive and unnecessary. Its not all that of an upgrade over regular dvds. The industry needs to get back back to us when holographic video recordings become possible.
hmm, but how are they going to remaster star wars in holographic video? the industry won't go for it if they can't resell their back catalogue!
 
I know I'm coming late to this party, but I agree with the OP's friends - I am not prepared to start replacing all my DVDs for a technology which might be replaced in a year or two.

I think it was easier for most people to make the leap from VHS because DVD technology offered MANY benefits besides improved picture quality. Better picture quality, ease of use (no rewinding, chapters, etc), more bonus features included, less storage space required, longevity of your purchase before it breaks/becomes unusable...these are all benefits that DVD gave us over VHS...and it make the leap worth it for most people.

But Blu-ray doesn't give us anything except better picture quality. Not that that is a bad thing...but that alone is not gonna drive alot of folks to change over. Some people simply don't care that much about HD if they get a pretty doggone decent picuture anyway. Especially if the incremental boost is gonna cost 'em a fortune in DVD replacements.

Yeah, but that's the beauty of it, you don't have to "replace" your DVDs. I mean there's a few titles I have replaced either on HD-DVD or blu-ray (older catalogue titles tend to benefit greatly from this upgrade!), but for the most part, I buy newer releases in BD format. I still have some 700 DVDs that I can continue to enjoy well into the future since BD players upconvert to 1080p while allowing you to selectively purchase future and catalogue titles at your discretion.
 
Blu-Ray is expensive and unnecessary. Its not all that of an upgrade over regular dvds. The industry needs to get back back to us when holographic video recordings become possible.
hmm, but how are they going to remaster star wars in holographic video? the industry won't go for it if they can't resell their back catalogue!

I think there will come a time when real time three-dimensional translations of 2d films will be as commonplace as colorizing old black and white movies. That being said perhaps silent films don't need a sound reel included and b&w films don't need to be colorized and therefore 2dhd films won't need to be translated into uhdv holos.:techman:
 
Question:

Do anyone here know whether or not the current Blu-ray players that are sold in the United States are region-free for all Blu-ray discs as well as all DVD discs, and will this be the case for Blu-ray players that are released in the American market for years to come?
 
...In fact the market is struggle so much that analyst predict you can pick up a player for $199.00 by Christmas time...
I can only say what's stopping us: and that is it. We bought a Toshiba HD player for Heroes and TOS first season in HD. When they lost, my husband said no blu-ray until it's under $200 bucks. That's all he paid for the Toshiba; and in fact, he figured the blu-rays would be under $200 by Christmas. It's kind of a magic number, I guess. (The HD player upconverts regular DVD's nicely; we don't use the previous players anymore. It's still worth it.)

Well, to be honest, remember that the ONLY reason HD-DVD players were so low in price was that Toshiba was trying to get a bigger foot in the door; and they were effectively selling the HD-DVD players at a loss in hopes they would drive up demand for the format; and make their money back that way.

That wasn't what killed HD-DVD though...what did was the fact that NONE of the studios was happy that Microsoft had a big hand in the codex development, and they were worried that dwn the road, MS would be introducing proprietary codex encoders and would start doing to HD-DVD encoding, what they did for the Windows OS - charge or up an outrageous license fee that would drive up production costs.
 
Question:

Do anyone here know whether or not the current Blu-ray players that are sold in the United States are region-free for all Blu-ray discs as well as all DVD discs, and will this be the case for Blu-ray players that are released in the American market for years to come?

No. Blu-Ray has region codes as well. Not the same ones as regular DVDs, but they do exist.

Many Blu-Ray titles are produced regionfree, though. It's kind of a crapshoot which ones are.
 
...In fact the market is struggle so much that analyst predict you can pick up a player for $199.00 by Christmas time...
I can only say what's stopping us: and that is it. We bought a Toshiba HD player for Heroes and TOS first season in HD. When they lost, my husband said no blu-ray until it's under $200 bucks. That's all he paid for the Toshiba; and in fact, he figured the blu-rays would be under $200 by Christmas. It's kind of a magic number, I guess. (The HD player upconverts regular DVD's nicely; we don't use the previous players anymore. It's still worth it.)

Well, to be honest, remember that the ONLY reason HD-DVD players were so low in price was that Toshiba was trying to get a bigger foot in the door; and they were effectively selling the HD-DVD players at a loss in hopes they would drive up demand for the format; and make their money back that way.

That wasn't what killed HD-DVD though...what did was the fact that NONE of the studios was happy that Microsoft had a big hand in the codex development, and they were worried that dwn the road, MS would be introducing proprietary codex encoders and would start doing to HD-DVD encoding, what they did for the Windows OS - charge or up an outrageous license fee that would drive up production costs.

But don't most Blu-Ray discs use the VC-1 codec now?
 
A random question. I didn't feel like starting a brand new thread:

Do Blu-Ray discs have regions limitations like DVDs. Can a US Blu-Ray disc only be played in a US Blu-Ray player?
 
Interesting.

Another related question: Do standard DVD region codes apply when using them in a Blu-Ray player? Or is a Blu-Ray player smart enough to play any region DVD?
 
^ Most (maybe all, I'm not sure) BD players also use DVD region coding. So basically you won't be able to play R2 (Europe) DVDs in a US bought BD player.

There might be a couple of BD players that you can unlock though... I honestly couldn't tell you. I own a PS3 and have no desire to buy a standalone BD player at this point.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top