I don't understand why you'd have to move the piece of space the ship occupies. I figure simply shortening the fabric of space in front of the vessel would be enough to do the job as it would cover more space in the same time.
I think if you did that, you'd just get a gravity well, possibly even a singularity, and the ship would fall into it, or get torn apart by tidal stress. Basically we're talking about gravity in front of the ship and antigravity behind it, balancing out to a flat space in the middle for the ship to ride in.
Yeah, Zephram Cochrane would've had a short trip...
I read somewhere that the current hypotheses about 'warp bubbles', etc wouldn't work because they'd require part of the drive to be located outside the bubble, and still be limited to sublight speeds.
The more I learn about the requirements of interstellar travel, the more I'm convinced that we'll never make it out there. We ugly bags of mostly water have to carry our entire environments around with us, and we have a pesky habit of turning grey and dropping dead even if we're in optimum health (becomes a problem during those interstellar long-hauls). Furthermore, in addition to having to haul around an entire biosphere, the energy/fuel requirements are, well, out of this world, even
without some sort of drive that has the power to bend spacetime itself. And given the power to bend spacetime itself we could probaby just take our entire planet with us wherever we went (and keep it warm and lit, with the moon in tow).
I think it'll be our progeny that carry on Earth's legacy - AI. They won't grow old. They'll be able to adapt to any environment instead of taking theirs with them. They'll be comparatively small and efficient, requiring less energy to get them out there. And they'll probably have the patience to do it.
Maybe some day an Earth AI will run into someone else's AI...