^ As worst director, right?
I knew someone would make a post like that. I thought of some of those directors too, but I didn't think the person who started the thread deserved flack for excluding them because I think the ideal list should cover directors whose work is both excellent, but also can appeal to a relatively wide audience and modern audiences.
A lot of those guys are more 'art film' directors whose work would go over the heads of or be perceived as too much pretentious or abstract to appreciate by general audiences (i.e. Bergman, Altman, Fellini, Trauffaut), [...]
[...]while others may have made some of the best single movies of all time, but didn't necessarily have the most impressive/consistent body of work (i.e. Allen, Wyler, Fleming, Godard).
Woody Allen is my personal favourite director and I've seen more movies directed by him than anyone else, but like 75% of his movies are mediocre or awful because he's made a movie almost every single year for about 30 years.
Also, I think "Chinatown", "The Searchers" and "Doctor Zhiavago" are overrated and suck.
Imagine anyone without their influences. Everyone's got them.But when he's good, he's so very good. But imagine Allen without "art film" directors Bergman or Fellini as influences.
Thanks for giving a response that was thorough without being smug or condescending, JTB.
I'm really trying, but for the most part I just can't seem to understand the appeal of film noir and westerns, which two of those movies fit into. I love "The Maltese Falcon", but it's an exception.
"Doctor Zhiavago" was tremendously boring to me. While watching it, I just thought to myself that if I can't be brought to care the least about any of the characters or the story in a movie after 2 hours (and that's not even the full running time), something must be wrong with it.
Imagine anyone without their influences. Everyone's got them.But when he's good, he's so very good. But imagine Allen without "art film" directors Bergman or Fellini as influences.
Thanks for giving a response that was thorough without being smug or condescending, JTB. I'm really trying, but for the most part I just can't seem to understand the appeal of film noir and westerns, which two of those movies fit into. I love "The Maltese Falcon", but it's an exception.
Like any genre, a lot of westerns are formulaic, but you're cheating yourself if you don't check out some of the classics like THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALENCE or THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN.
And I speak as one who shunned westerns as a youngster because the setting didn't appeal to me, but has come to appreciate them as I've gotten older. Just think of them as science fiction stories about the challenges of colonizing lawless border planets . . . .
Not sure why anyone wouldn't like film noir. Moody, atmospheric crime stories about the dark side of society and human nature . . . what's not to love?
^ As worst director, right?
no, best. i like all of his films i've seen:
Bad Boys, Bad Boys 2, Armageddon, The Island, Transformers, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen and The Rock
lololololalso Guillermo del Toro.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.