• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Battlestar Galactica on the front of Ghost Ship

ernie90125

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Red Shirt
Ghost_Ship_cover.jpg


Dinghy.jpg

All known details here:

http://www.colonialfleets.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18884
 
Yes, I guess it does look rather like Cattlecar Gigantica, albeit upside down.

Then again, as one of the Apollo 11 Astronauts demonstrated with a heaping spoonful of water in a TV broadcast from the translunar coast, "up" and "down" are meaningless in space.
 
Also Colonial Vipers were on the cover of The Romulan Way by Diane Duane.

And in Germany, the cast of The Black Hole are on the cover of a Trek novel by some bizarre mistake.
 
I am a big fan but of science fiction in general.

Regarding the question about the inverted position of the ship in question, I cannot tell you the reason,
perhaps I can say that it was the photograph that they got for me and which I documented, without realising it.

I can't remember when we realized the mistake we made with the Battlestar
Galactica but I guess it was quite a while ago.


Funny how all he/she comments about was that the ship was upside down. Not...that the ship was from the wrong television show. :confused:
 
I wish I'd saved a copy of the Strange New Worlds cover that used an A-Wing fighter from Star Wars as a sci-fi submarine (it was replaced with the Delta Flyer for the final version after that was pointed out when the cover was unveiled). Now, it only exists in our memories. And someone else's hard drive, probably. And maybe mine, I've got a lot of unorganized crap from many years ago, and I almost certainly didn't name it "Strange New Worlds A-Wing" or something easy to find like that.
 
Still not as bad as the movie Space Mutiny shamelessly using stock effects shots from BSG and then appearing on MST3k

It would only be shameless if they didn't pay for the rights. Lots of low-budget movies and TV shows have reused stock footage.

And I think people today have an exaggerated perception of Galactica's prominence back in the day. It was really kind of a flash in the pan; it started big but quickly lost viewers and got cancelled, then had an embarrassing, mercifully brief revival that nobody wanted but the network bean counters, and then it lived on only in afternoon-movie reruns along with all the other repackaged TV episodes and schlocky B movies that occupied those time slots. So it's not really a surprise that people in the '80s (both Space Mutiny and Ghost Ship came out in 1988) would've considered it obscure enough to be fair game for recycling.
 
Battlestar Galactica? Try Battle Beyond the Stars for the most amount of stock footage from that movie used in other films.
 
Battlestar Galactica? Try Battle Beyond the Stars for the most amount of stock footage from that movie used in other films.

Oh, Roger Corman built whole movies around stock footage from other Roger Corman movies. He did something kind of clever with Wizards of the Lost Kingdom II, building a PG-rated, family-friendly barbarian film around action footage from two R-rated, nudity-laden barbarian films he'd made a few years earlier, The Warrior and the Sorceress with David Carradine and Barbarian Queen with Lana Clarkson. He brought back both lead actors as new characters in a new story, but with the same costumes, so he could repurpose fight scenes from the earlier movies as part of the new plot.

Then there was the 1980 Gamera: Super Monster, which built a newly shot frame story around the fight scenes from the original seven Gamera movies, as well as inexplicable interludes of anime footage from Space Battleship Yamato and Galaxy Express 999. For that matter, several of those original Gamera movies had lengthy stock footage sequences revisiting fights from earlier Gamera movies, since they were very, very cheap.
 
I believe Corman recycled the same "burning house" footage in many of his Poe movies with Vincent Price.
 
It would only be shameless if they didn't pay for the rights. Lots of low-budget movies and TV shows have reused stock footage.

And I think people today have an exaggerated perception of Galactica's prominence back in the day. It was really kind of a flash in the pan; it started big but quickly lost viewers and got cancelled, then had an embarrassing, mercifully brief revival that nobody wanted but the network bean counters, and then it lived on only in afternoon-movie reruns along with all the other repackaged TV episodes and schlocky B movies that occupied those time slots. So it's not really a surprise that people in the '80s (both Space Mutiny and Ghost Ship came out in 1988) would've considered it obscure enough to be fair game for recycling.

Nah it was shameless, even though they did legally buy the rights to the footage from the equally shameless Universal. IIRC, Universal were in a bit of a financial pickle, so they were willing to do anything to make money from their IPs. Even if it meant selling stock footage.
 
Nah it was shameless, even though they did legally buy the rights to the footage from the equally shameless Universal. IIRC, Universal were in a bit of a financial pickle, so they were willing to do anything to make money from their IPs. Even if it meant selling stock footage.

The licensing and purchase of stock footage is a routine practice that's been commonly used since the early days of filmmaking. The only reason it's shameless is that there's no sensible reason for anyone to feel shame about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sci
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top