Not really. The previous movie made about $650 million. By the end of today, they are predicting it will be up to $525 million.Unfortunately, that's just the first four days of release: it has to have 'legs' beyond that first week financially straight into May. Let's hope that it does.
I'm not saying Jonathan Kent can't have flaws, I'm saying that in 70 years of depiction
I really hope the studio doesn't listen to all the people saying the movie was "way too dark". It wasn't. Its level of darkness was just right. Everything doesn't have to be a Marvel yuk-fest.
And THAT is my point. A section of the fanbase want the movies to do it BECAUSE the comics did it. To see beloved comic book characters translated into live action with the best effects current money can buy. Not your cup of tea, as I said before, fine. Doesn't invalidate the criticism of those who want to see something different than you do.And I'd rather not have the movies do something just becuase the comics did it. Hell if being interpreted in different way is good enough for characters like Sherlock Holmes and Dracula I don't see why isn't good enough for a supporting character in a comic book.
BvS was pretty dark in the theater where I saw it. In some scenes it was kind of hard to tell what was going on. I wish they would turn up the brightness on the projector.
Kor
If it had, you know:Agreed, part of me thought halfway through the movie, "this would make a great superhero movie if it wasn't based on the Justice League". If that was Watchmen part 3 (with Man of Steel being part 2), it would've been the greatest comic book movie of all time.
And THAT is my point. A section of the fanbase want the movies to do it BECAUSE the comics did it. To see beloved comic book characters translated into live action with the best effects current money can buy. Not your cup of tea, as I said before, fine. Doesn't invalidate the criticism of those who want to see something different than you do.
To be fair, I don't think it's the simple mention of the name that does all that. I think it's just something that catches him off guard and helps break him out of this furious and enraged state he's been in-- just long enough for Lois to swoop in and explain what is happening with Martha Kent.
Obviously It's still pretty laughable and ridiculous how quickly Bruce puts aside that anger and hatred that he's been harboring all movie long and takes to calling Superman his friend (especially when he already acknowledged to Alfred that Superman wasn't their enemy now but only needed to be stopped for what he might do in the future), but I don't think it was just the name that caused all that.
Well, they have not been slavishly following their comic book versions of the stories when translating them to the screen - and I kind of doubt Chris Evans as 'Captain America' won't be a part of Avengers 3&4 (The Infinity War) films.Anyone remember Captain America dying at the end of Marvel's "Civil War" crossover? Marvel Execs might possibly be very pissed right now.
If it had, you know:
...
And Marvel movies do, while being reasonably faithful to their comic book counterparts, whether Ultimate or 616 in nature. Which is perhaps why the Marvel movies are a bit more universally praised than this movie which seems a bit more divisive.And if there were a great many of them their comics probably wouldn't have had a major reboot a few years ago. And a major blockbuster is except to make way more than a comic book.
The ONLY time he called Superman friend was when he rescued Martha and said "I'm a friend of your son". That was more to let her know he was one of the good guys and she shouldn't fear him. Basically Batman had his "this man is not our enemy" moment like the solider from the first movie.
And Marvel movies do, while being reasonably faithful to their comic book counterparts,
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.