• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"Batman 3" and "Superman" both in 2012 -- and in IMAX?

Spiderman 3 sucked.
X-Men 3 sucked.
The Matrix 3 sucked.
Pirates of the Caribbean 3 sucked.

What other trilogies have come out recently that had crappy conclusions?

As an artist, wouldn't you rather the person in charge take the time they need to make a quality film? Is two years long enough to write and film a movie? Sure, but if the director doesn't feel confident about doing it in that timeframe, why force him? As I recall, Nolan wasn't sure he even wanted to do another Batman film because he wasn't sure he could make one with quality equal to The Dark Knight.

Artists aren't in the business (or at least they shouldn't be in the business) of making things as quickly as possible just to rake in cash. They should be concerned with the quality of their work. However much time they require should be up to them.
 
Are the writing/directing team that spits out Epic Movie, Disaster Movie, Meet the Spartans, etc., considered artists? :lol:

They've got another reference movie (they're not called spoofs by some since there aren't actually jokes, just references to other movies) coming out called Vampires Suck.
 
Yeah I was shocked when I read about Zach Levi testing for the role. I could totally see him as Clark Kent but not Superman. As for the length of time between productions...it's not surprising that Nolan would want to take a break. The productions on both films have been intense for him and the actors. Also he was genuinely surprised by the overwhelming box office success of "The Dark Knight" and needed time to himself and he and Jonah and David needed to find a story that would either top that or at least match it. Not to mention that he'd been wanting to film "Inception" for at least eight years and felt the time was right in his career to take advantage and do it.
 
And of course those who worked closely with Heath Ledger on The Dark Knight - including Chris Nolan and Christian Bale - would have needed some time to get over his death. Jumping straight back into another Batman film isn't necessarily something they were in the right frame of mind to do. I'm sure the break did them all good from that point of view.
 
They can't come up with a story within a years time???


Three years is pretty standard. The original STAR WARS movies were all released three years apart.

And the last thing you want is to let a good creative team burn out by forcing them to churn out the same thing over and over. I love writing STAR TREK novels, but I'd go nuts if I had to keep writing them one after another. That's why I also do ALIAS and CSI and UNDERWORLD and every thing else. That way I won't get bored with STAR TREK . . . or DC Comics . . . or whatever . . . .

Letting Nolan do other things in between BATMAN movies seems to be working well. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 
Also I think there was a recent interview from Chris where he stated that they did have ideas for a story and have been working on Batman 3 for a while now...just the script wasn't done until recently (if it even has yet). The wait between productions is about two years anyways. I think there was a year or so between "Batman Begins" and "The Prestige".
 
What's really ironic about that is that Brandon Routh has been guest-starring with Levi on Chuck.... :lol:

It's only ironic if he gets the part. ;) (Especially since Chuck beat Routh's character in climactic fight scenes. Accidentally symbolic?)

Yeah I was shocked when I read about Zach Levi testing for the role. I could totally see him as Clark Kent but not Superman.

Somebody should whip up a Photoshop of him in the suit! (But please, not the blue-and-burgundy SR version.)
 
http://geektyrant.com/news/2010/7/1...ting-superman-reboot-zachary-levi-auditi.html

RUMOR: The Man Of Steel Auditions Underway With Jonathan Nolan Directing
According GeekTyrant, Warner Bros has selected Chris Nolan's brother to direct Superman reboot, plus one of the guys who have auditioned. Check it Out!


The last we heard from The Man Of Steel was that Chris Columbus would be directing, and fortunately that rumor was debunked. And we know that The Dark Knight director Christopher Nolan will be producing the project, with an "exciting" story ready for development.

Apparently GeekTyrant has received info on whose directing the Superman reboot, and one of the men who auditioned.

"According to our sources that reside on the WB studio lot that have informed us that Christopher Nolan's brother Jonathan is currently the unannounced director of the Superman reboot film. Word on the lot is that he is attached to direct the film and has been on the studio lot a lot these days working on pre-development stuff."

With this project giving Jonathan Nolan's first seat in the director's chair, GeekTyrant includes that "it was said at the time that a key reason behind Chris Nolan's producing role is to help out his brother, teaching & guiding him along the way.

GT also received word from the same sources that auditions for the "Clark Kent" role are currently taking place. And that NBC TV show Chuck star, Zachery Levi is one of many who have already auditioned.

Production on The Man Of Steel should begin in time for a Christmas 2012 release. And hopefully some confirmation, or any unknown info on the project would be revealed at the San Diego Comic-Con, but it's highly doubted.

Though it sounds plausible, you can obviously treat this has a rumor for now. But what are thoughts on Jonathan Nolan directing and Zachery playing The Last Son of Krypton?

How to get over Nolan not directing your movie: Hire another Nolan! This would indeed be Christmas if it turns out to be true.
 
Why would it be Christmas? He's never directed anything before, maybe he wouldn't be good at it? To get all excited just because he's a Nolan seems a little premature.
 
From Clint Morris at Moviehole:

A couple of days back, GeekTyrant reported a salacious little bit suggesting Jonah Nolan was up for directing duties on the new ''Superman'' movie. An easy enough rumour to swallow too, if you ask me - after all, besides the fact that Jonah Nolan's brother Chris is attached to produce the 2012 Man of Steel re-rinse, Jonah himself is already working at WB - as a writer on another high-profile superhero flick, ''Batman 3''. Still, that didn't stop a couple of sites from suggesting the aforementioned report was merely supposition... or codswallop.

For a couple of days now I've been working on getting some kind of confirmation... Or even a response... from someone at the studio (not necessarily those working on ''Superman'') regarding the rumours. Now I'm not just talking about trying to touch base with the PR department there, I'm talking about getting some sort of inside response from a desk jockey. Some of you may recall that I was developing a film at Warner Bros a couple of years ago (before abandoning it to work on a couple of smaller, less ambitious projects like ''Complacent'' and ''Cowboy Charm'')? well, I made quite a few friends in my time there, and while I haven't kept in touch with everyone from my Burbank stretch (some have moved on to other companies, and so forth), there is a select few that I do play phone hooky with every month or so. And I thought at least one of them might be privy to some info on the tentpole - and I was right.

Late this afternoon I hopped on the phone with a contact who shed some light on the J. Nolan rumours.

"You know, some of that is true", my very reliable* contact, said ."Jonathan Nolan is not onboard yet, but it looks like he will get the job. Jonah wants to direct, Chris wants to land him that gig, WB doesn't want to upset Chris. That said, it is far from a done deal -- but with Chris and Emma producing, the odds are with Jonah - kind of like Michael Mann producing his daughter's first feature: "How bad could things go?"".

"Also, it is a TV star that they're looking at for the lead - but, despite what that article says, I don't believe anyone has actually tested." (He/She has heard nothing of Zachary Levi being considered). So there you have it, Nolan is the frontrunner for the job.

Sorry? What? Oh, you want to know which "TV star" is currently atop of the WB wishlist?

Says our insider, "[He's a] popular TV actor that no one is thinking of, but everyone will be thrilled with if he pulls on the blue tights"

Your first guess is likely the right one.

Still, the film's director also has a say - and he's yet to be officially appointed, let alone begun meeting with actors, so anyone could end up in the suit. Still, the studio does have their favourite at the moment.

(So, definitely no Brandon Routh, then? ''Certain very well-placed people at Warners loved Brandon Routh as Superman and wished he was continuing in the role, but unfortunately, he won't be back". But we knew that, right?)

My contact followed-up the phone call with an email later in the day, just to kindly ask if I could remove some names from the piece, and to suggest we also don't refer to the new film as a reboot because... "This Superman is neither a reboot or a sequel. It's just a Superman film. The basic elements of the storyline are: BIG action, BIG set-pieces, witty dialogue, playful romance, a light-hearted feelgood mood juxtaposed with derring-do and danger, top-notch cast, epic feel, sci-fi background (sounds a little like Donner, right?) BUT with some sort of huge twist on the legend."

Huge twist, hey? Shit, hopefully we're not talking Penguins with machine-guns!?

And that's all our contact has... for the moment. But I think that's enough to suggest that while nothing is solid at the moment, the concrete is being poured.

* This source has been spot-on before - he/she let us know, for instance, that Liev Schreiber was joining the cast of "Salt" (which we ran about a week before Variety confirmed it) and that Teresa Palmer had been cast in the now-abandoned "Justice League" (again, before the trades announced it). There's actually been quite a few other occasions - he/she has slipped us solid info on "Lethal Weapon 5" and "Fury Road", for instance - where this person has been spot-on.
 
Just because someone can write well doesn't mean they have the chops to direct. Writing and directing are two very different things. There may be a lot of filmmakers who have done a terrific job writing and directing all or most of their movies (i.e. Tarantino, Allen), but that doesn't mean it's easy for everyone. Kevin Smith has even admitted to struggling with directing even through writing comes pretty easily to him.

I would feel more comfortable with someone who has at least one solid movie under their belt taking the reigns on the Superman franchise. Marc Webb being picked to do a the new Spider-Man movie gives me more confidence than the prospect of Jonathan Nolan directing a Superman movie, even though I think the movies Nolan has written are superior to "(500) Days of Summer". I don't think "(500) Days of Summer" was perfect, but it definitely showed that the guy can do some tremendous visual storytelling (particularly in the musical and split screen sequences).
 
Talking about TV star and pulling on tights, the first thought that comes to my mind is Tom Welling.
 
From Clint Morris at Moviehole:

Says our insider, "[He's a] popular TV actor that no one is thinking of, but everyone will be thrilled with if he pulls on the blue tights"

Your first guess is likely the right one.
This bemuses me. How can our first guess likely be the right one, if everyone will likely guess someone different (and if no one is thinking of them--the two statements seem quite contradictory). My first guess was Jeffrey Donovan, but that's probably because I just watched Burn Notice yesterday (he would be good, though, and I wouldn't mind an over-30 Superman).

I don't watch many popular TV shows, which stars are considered hot right now?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top