I don't get Kings of Leon. They're just don't okay. I don't understand the sudden massive success.
I used to be huge into Nirvana, but I've waned on them over the last few years. In fact, I think that Cobain is the least talented person in the band (though he does write pretty good lyrics). My favorite Seattle band right now is Pearl Jam, but Alice in Chains and Soundgarden are amazing as well.
Well, I wasn't going to list out my actual preferences...but as long as you have, I'll play. Not including supergroups/solo projects here, I'll go with:
1. Pearl Jam (this band has not changed position since the release of Ten - IMO, one of the best albums ever made, by anyone, ever...and nothing they have done since has given me reason to doubt them for a second)
2. Alice In Chains (love all the Layne-era stuff like crazy, warming up quickly to the Duvall-era stuff)
<insert gap here>
3. (tie) Soundgarden and Hole (Courtney has had a lot of issues, but 'making bad music' was never one of them.)
4. Nirvana (yes, I like Hole more than I like Nirvana - go figure)
5. Stone Temple Pilots
6. (tie) Screaming Trees and Veruca Salt
Except for the ranking of 'Hole', you sound like my grunge Soul Mate. I could (and do) listen to Ten, Vs., Vitalogy, and Yield all day and fill the remaining hours with Riot Act, Lost Dogs, Avacado and Backspacer.
^ Is the revived Alice in Chains worth listening to? I have to admit, I generally hate it when bands get back together after the death of a singer (I don't mind the AC/DC 'singer died? No prob, let's just carry on guys' attitude; consistency isn't my strong point) so I hadn't given them a chance.
^ Is the revived Alice in Chains worth listening to? I have to admit, I generally hate it when bands get back together after the death of a singer (I don't mind the AC/DC 'singer died? No prob, let's just carry on guys' attitude; consistency isn't my strong point) so I hadn't given them a chance.
I think so. At times they're great, at times they sound like a poor man's Alice in Chains. But a poor man's Alice in Chains beats most bands. They actually sound heavier if that's even possible.
^
Radiohead's kind of an interesting example for me. Everything up to and including Kid A is pure, unadulterated genius to me. Amnesiac felt less like a whole album than what it actually was: stuff from Kid A that wasn't good enough. And since then they've left me cold. I don't mind the digital noodling, I just feel like modern Radiohead is doing it for its own sake.
And yet I have friends who love the whole catalog front to back. So maybe I don't get modern Radiohead either.
While we're on grunge I just wanna say that I have no idea how Soundgarden ever got lumped in with that crowd, other than sharing a place and time. I think they're better, for starters.
I love Nirvana and Pearl Jam and Sonic Youth and all that but Soundgarden, to paraphrase Jules Winfield, ain't in the same ballpark or even the same fuckin sport. I listen to Badmotorfinger or Superunknown and I'm hearing Tool or Rush more than I'm hearing any of their Seattle contemporaries. Cornell and Cobain are both excellent songwriters, but there's a rhythmic and melodic sophistication to Soungarden that just isn't there in Nirvana.
Oh and speaking of Radiohead, yeah, there's another band I don't get. Not to say they aren't talented, but none of their music clicks with me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.