Ooh, good one! He could definitely have intructed his pre-BttF 2 future-visiting self to stow away some materials, and, knowing everything would work out, offer no explanation. In fact, you may have me convinced on this point.Secondly, just to offer a possible explanation of how he might have pulled it off, just for the fun of it: Maybe he used another letter like the one to contact Marty, only this time addressed to himself and asking for a few components to be sent back in time.
Ooh, good one! He could definitely have intructed his pre-BttF 2 future-visiting self to stow away some materials, and, knowing everything would work out, offer no explanation. In fact, you may have me convinced on this point.Secondly, just to offer a possible explanation of how he might have pulled it off, just for the fun of it: Maybe he used another letter like the one to contact Marty, only this time addressed to himself and asking for a few components to be sent back in time.
![]()
(b) be notifying his past self of his Wild West fate, which is also something he's not too fond of either.
He did as much with 1955 Doc to get Marty home, but I agree it's very unlikely Doc would've asked his future self(ves) to help him rebuild a time machine in 1885 when, as I say above, he could ask them for any number of other things rendering the venture pointless.
I would like to think that Doc was able to make everything he needed right there in 1885... Then he traveled to 2015 (perhaps much later) to retro-fit the train.
We should keep in mind that Doc was a scientist and could likely create almost anything![]()
I would like to think that Doc was able to make everything he needed right there in 1885... Then he traveled to 2015 (perhaps much later) to retro-fit the train.
We should keep in mind that Doc was a scientist and could likely create almost anything![]()
Well as said, he just needed a way to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricty he needed. In the DeLorean he used the best thing available to him in 1985 -nuclear fission which he later retrofitted to the "safer" nuclear fusion sometime in the 21st century.
Recall that in BTTF1 the DeLorean's time cicruits only ran off the lightning bolt channeled from the clock tower, at the end of BTTF2 another lightning bolt (actually several, which may have contributed to the overload of time-circuits but on a related note, I wonder how lightning strikes an object that isn't grounded) activates the time circuits.
So the time-train "runs on steam." Doc simply built a steam-electrical generator. Using his "presto logs" and possibly even some reinforcement of the train's boiler he was able to create a large pressure-boiler to superboil water (as what happens in present-day nuclear reactors) and that superboiled water runs the generator that charges a capacitor(s) with the 1.21gw of electrical power. All... "possible" (although 1.21gw is a LOT of electricity to generate by a steam train's engine if we accept Doc's "presto logs" being able to kick up the boiler temperature to run the train at 90 miles an hour it's "possible" some of that energy can be channeled to the time circuits.)
The only "hitch" is the electrical components of the time machine which is simple enough to get around with Doc hand-blowing his own vacuum tubes and other forms of circuitry he's able to build in the 1880s/1890s.
Again, suitable replacement parts for the DeLorean weren't available until 1947, when some of the first transistors were invented. But that's not to say there's nothing available to Doc in 1885 to built "a" time machine. He simply just found a way using much simpler electronics and technology and "mechanics" rather than electronics. It's apparent that the time-train's time cirucits are contained in, and take up most if not all of, the tender. (the first "car" behind the engine that on a normal train contains the wood for the boiler.)
Personally, I didn't much like the time-train. It was... "too much." I think it would've been neat to see Doc arrive in something jauntier like an 1898 Panhard, or even something "cuter" something resembling the time machine from, well, "The Time Machine."
You drain the gas if you're putting a car in storage for a while. Doc was smart. He did this.
To bad he did not keep it if that were the case, Gas would have been a usfull chemical to have in 1885 for some invention or something.
They did have gasoline in 1885 -- it is a byproduct of refined oil. But back then, it wasn't used for anything as was merely dumped off to the side.
Also, Doc would have drained the fuel tank, because gasoline breaks down over time and turns into varnish. Any fuel left in the DeLorean would have gummed up the fuel pump and the fuel lines, making for some needed repair work before attempting a trip back to 1885.
Here's the thing you are all forgetting. it's a joke scene. I think the writers are playing the 4th wall game here deliberately. If you are a BTTF fan you probably know that they never intended for there to be any sequels, because they never would have put the girl in the car at the end of the first movie, and that the end of the first film was a joke. However they have since built the trilogy from that moment (as a means of keeping another producer's hands off the project) so the "joke" was made into a story element. So at the end of the third movie, they decided to incorporate pretty much the same joke, while slightly stepping outside the films to say that no there will not be any BTTF films, even to followup this new time macbhine. They ensured this by making the train preposterous and impossible to begin with, but by that point the films are over. In other words, Doc probably couldn't have channelled or generated the correct gigawatts into the train to begin with, but by the time the viewer tries to contemplate this plot hole, the curtain is closed and the film is over, just as it should have been in the first film.
Here's the thing you are all forgetting. it's a joke scene. I think the writers are playing the 4th wall game here deliberately. If you are a BTTF fan you probably know that they never intended for there to be any sequels, because they never would have put the girl in the car at the end of the first movie, and that the end of the first film was a joke. However they have since built the trilogy from that moment (as a means of keeping another producer's hands off the project) so the "joke" was made into a story element. So at the end of the third movie, they decided to incorporate pretty much the same joke, while slightly stepping outside the films to say that no there will not be any BTTF films, even to followup this new time macbhine. They ensured this by making the train preposterous and impossible to begin with, but by that point the films are over. In other words, Doc probably couldn't have channelled or generated the correct gigawatts into the train to begin with, but by the time the viewer tries to contemplate this plot hole, the curtain is closed and the film is over, just as it should have been in the first film.
Thank you! I was going to say this. Funny that you kind of got ignored and people continued discussing it.
I understood that the end was all for fun when I saw it in the theatre at age 15. That's because I'm cool, I guess.![]()
Here's the thing you are all forgetting. it's a joke scene. I think the writers are playing the 4th wall game here deliberately. If you are a BTTF fan you probably know that they never intended for there to be any sequels, because they never would have put the girl in the car at the end of the first movie, and that the end of the first film was a joke. However they have since built the trilogy from that moment (as a means of keeping another producer's hands off the project) so the "joke" was made into a story element. So at the end of the third movie, they decided to incorporate pretty much the same joke, while slightly stepping outside the films to say that no there will not be any BTTF films, even to followup this new time macbhine. They ensured this by making the train preposterous and impossible to begin with, but by that point the films are over. In other words, Doc probably couldn't have channelled or generated the correct gigawatts into the train to begin with, but by the time the viewer tries to contemplate this plot hole, the curtain is closed and the film is over, just as it should have been in the first film.
Thank you! I was going to say this. Funny that you kind of got ignored and people continued discussing it.
I understood that the end was all for fun when I saw it in the theatre at age 15. That's because I'm cool, I guess.![]()
It was ignorned because we're not looking for real-world/meta answers but "in universe" answers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.