Not much of a surprise but good to see the film is emulating its predecessor.
The article has been updated; it’s nothing. And I think it would be a surprise if (just) A4 were moved up, considering there’s less than two months between Captain Marvel and A4 as it is.
BTW, about A4’s supposedly spoilery title, I’m confused. What are they afraid of spoiling? They can’t wait for Captain Marvel to hit theaters before announcing a name for A4 with the release dates just eight weeks apart, can they? What else is there to spoil between now and then?
After killing all the other Dwarves, why did Thanos wreck Etri’s hands but spare his life? Was he just being sensitive to the audience’s need for exposition, or was there some other reason?
Not much of a surprise but good to see the film is emulating its predecessor.
That’s not how he handled Nidavellir. There were 300 Dwarves manning the station. After forcing them to make the gauntlet, he killed all of them except Etri, whose hands he destroyed instead of killing him.He only kills half of those he encounters, like how he spared half the Asgardians in the opening attack and launched them off in lifepods. Likely there are other Dwarves who lived but weren't at the Forge.
That’s not how he handled Nidavellir. There were 300 Dwarves manning the station. After forcing them to make the gauntlet, he killed all of them except Etri, whose hands he destroyed instead of killing him.
Which begs the question for me. Those Asgardians just suffered a near genocide already.He only kills half of those he encounters, like how he spared half the Asgardians in the opening attack and launched them off in lifepods. Likely there are other Dwarves who lived but weren't at the Forge.
Which begs the question for me. Those Asgardians just suffered a near genocide already.
By what standard does Thanos justify that half of the survivors still need to die?
Also with the Snap presumably another half of the remaining survivors disappeared?
That's it, right there.I don’t think the Loki/Hulk thing is not any deeper than Loki referencing Stark’s We have a Hulk moment in Avengers 1.
And his own puny god ass whoopin
Thanos spared him because he gave in and made the gauntlet (thinking it might spare the lives of the other dwarves). "Your life is yours."That’s not how he handled Nidavellir. There were 300 Dwarves manning the station. After forcing them to make the gauntlet, he killed all of them except Etri, whose hands he destroyed instead of killing him.
I have a few questions about “THE AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR”.
When Thanos’ ship had appeared before the Asgardian ship, why didn’t Loki use the Space Stone inside the Tesseract to transport them beyond Thanos’ reach?
Also, why did Loki believe the Hulk would be the one to defeat Thanos, when he had earlier witnessed Thor finally kick the former’s ass on Sakaar in “THOR: RAGNAROK”?
One last question … how is it that Thanos was able to easily defeat Thor in the movie’s first scene, yet when he used the Power Stone to destroy the Asgardian ship … Thor survived? In other words, the Power Stone wasn’t powerful enough to destroy Thor, yet he was easily defeated by Thanos at the beginning of the movie?
So you’re Peter Parker’s father?My son just called Tarzan (1999) a “really old movie.” I almost punched him.
You don’t know how annoying that is until you experience it in real life.
My son just called Tarzan (1999) a “really old movie.” I almost punched him.
You don’t know how annoying that is until you experience it in real life.
My son just called Tarzan (1999) a “really old movie.” I almost punched him.
You don’t know how annoying that is until you experience it in real life.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.