Well, there are good symbolic reasons not to use that again, though.
Of course. It's still my favorite.Well, there are good symbolic reasons not to use that again, though.
I'm sure he was joking Your Highness, no need to get your panties in a bunch.
I see nothing lewd about any of the four pics. Merely four young ladies who made some stellar costumes and who look lovely in them.
As for them not working in live action, are they really any worse than, say, Spider-man's costume for example?
All of which may be true. However, let's err on the side of caution, okay? You've been given a moment's grace so use it wisely. There won't be any othersNot really. The above images are all safety in the realm of costumes and character poses done in the comics/cartoons. There isn't anything that is overtly sexualized/NSFW about them. Sure there is a lot of exposed leg but that's not the same as purposefully exposed cleavage or other suggestive poses seen in adult materials.
All of which may be true. However, let's err on the side of caution, okay? You've been given a moment's grace so use it wisely. There won't be any othersNot really. The above images are all safety in the realm of costumes and character poses done in the comics/cartoons. There isn't anything that is overtly sexualized/NSFW about them. Sure there is a lot of exposed leg but that's not the same as purposefully exposed cleavage or other suggestive poses seen in adult materials.
Google are acting like asses, but it's their money that supports things. What can you do ?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.