Every time someone references that poll Baby Jesus sheds a tear.
I love the Brosnan era Bond films! Wish we'd have gotten that 5th one they were moving forward on...till Cubby Broccoli died and the "kids" inherited the Aston Martin only to ditch it in favor of doing Bourne 2.0 for the character.
Wait, where were we now? Oh, yeah!
Cinema.
Thor's been packing on weight.Too much Earth food?
![]()
Because escapes have to be shown honestly. They spent ten minutes showing his escape from an elevator but none showing his escape from the facility.And I've now read all of the posts FSM has made over the last couple days, thus I am now sad.
FSM re: your complaints about Cap's escape from the Triskelion, what is your obsession with needing to be shown everything when it comes to a sequence of events? You had a similar argument in the "Interstellar" thread where you complained about the lack of showing every detail and aspect of McConaughey's actions in the tesseract and how it related to events in the movie. The problem being the movie made it pretty clear what was happening without reading too much into it but you seemed to want the movie to literally spell out everything that was going on including the equation data McConaughey was sending.
Here, you seem to want to know the intricate details of how Cap managed to escape the Triskelion garage. Why?! What is to be gained to watch him rush into the garage, get into his bike, adjust the choke and throttle, jump on the starter, have it fail, make these adjustments again. Take the bike of it's stand then accelerate towards the door and then hop the bike over the closing gate. Which OMG!!!! Had a CGI lower portion to it.
Would anything at all have been gained by seeing all of that?
No?
So then why show it?!
You also seem to be taking the word "Cinematic" in the MCU's name a bit too literally in the very Fourth-Year in Columbia University Film School sort of way of meaning an "art form where every frame is crafted with the hair of angels to be utterly perfect in every respect" other than, "yeah, this stuff is live-action rather than ink on paper."
You seem to be taking things a touch too much, man.
Notice how T2 might not have showed us every part of the escape from the mental hospital, but it showed almost every phase of it, all the way too the parking garage.. and the pacing and tension was built up perfectly. Real filmmaking.
Yeah, requiring them to show him get to his motorcycle is terrible film making. Editing is a useful tool. All film makers do it.
Maybe we should also have had to watch them drive several hours to get the bunker in New Jersey (in real time)? Are you mad they cut that out?
Because escapes have to be shown honestly.
I guess his point is that an escape is a dangerous situation where every moment is important, one mistake too many and you're caught. When you're escaping from something the tension comes from the fact that you have to keep running, no chance to rest, and if there are obstacles in your way you have to beat them. By skipping part of the escape the filmmaker "cheats" and conveniently skips one or more of the obstacles. The hero doesn't earn his freedom because some part of the escape is magically skipped over.
Or something. I don't agree it's terrible, but I guess it takes away some tension.
<<Did he stay on the back-roads or did he take the turnpike?! I MUST KNOW!!! >>![]()
Classic!<<Did he stay on the back-roads or did he take the turnpike?! I MUST KNOW!!! >>![]()
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.