• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Asgard class cruiser

Shizzlick

Ensign
Newbie

Much larger image

I originally created the Asgard class back in 2002/2003, using Paint, which can still be found here, at the JoAT. My inexperience at both drawing starships and working in Paint is pretty obvious, which is why at the beginning of this year, I decided to go back and update the design. This is my progress so far. With nacelles, she'll be around 420m long.

Some history on the ship:

The Asgard was developed as a competing design to the Prometheus. While the latter design was focused on the multi-vector assault mode and it's extremely high warp speed capabilities, the Asgard focused on a more traditional approach, taking the fire-power of ships such as the Galaxy or Sovereign and placing it in a ship much closer in size to the Intrepid class. While ultimately the Prometheus class would win the competition, 3 Asgards would be constructed. (I personally like to think that only Prometheus herself retained the MVAM and all future ships in that class had a unified hull).

Like Prometheus, the Asgard features regenerative shielding and ablative armour. Her phasers are Type XII (based on how easily the Prometheus blew through the Nebula's shields) and she has 4 pulse fire torpedo tubes. Unique to the Asgard are a pair of phaser cannons flanking the deflector dish. These are capable of firing a sustained phaser beam for several seconds. The power output of each cannon would be similar to one of the pulse phaser cannons on the Defiant, although the Asgard cannons must wait significantly longer between firing. (My thinking for the cannons is to provide the ship a strong opening attack, used to try and quickly batter down an opponents shields for an early torpedo strike to the hull. Once fully engaged in combat, the limited firing arc of the cannons mean that the ship would then use her conventional phaser arrays. The sustained fire is intended to make them more useful against stationary targets such as starbases or against larger targets that cannot easily manoeuvre out of the way, such as Borg vessels.)

The Asgard is equipped with two full size pairs of impulse engines, a primary pair in the stern and the secondary pair at the aft of the saucer. The two pairs are intended to provide redundancy in combat and larger power reserves.

Warp performance would be largely the same as the Sovereign, say 9.9 maximum cruise and a maximum burst of maybe 9.95 for 24 hours. Of course, this is easily beaten by the Intrepid's maximum cruise of 9.975, which I assume the Prometheus beats slightly.

Asgard's big advantage over the Prometheus is her internal space. The Prometheus is a long, slim ship to start with, and a great of internal space must be taken up by the multi-vector assault mode and all the related equipment. Asgard doesn't have that problem, which is why she can have a shuttlebay that dwarfs the one on the Prometheus (which due to the seperation line, can't have a maintenance level below the main bay, further reducing it's capability).

Woah, that was a lot longer than I intended. What I'm trying to do is keep my original 15yr old fanboys assault cruiser intact while providing a valid reason for why Starfleet would build two starships that fill the same role in the same period of time.

For the artwork, while there's still a great deal of detail to be added, the main problem I have is coming up with a nacelle design that I like. :brickwall:

This is my first post here, although I've been lurking for a few months, so hey all. :)
 
It's a cool design so far and fits the time period nicely. There are a lot of aspects about it I truly like. I do have one question. I know you're still trying to come up with a nacelle design. My question is, how are they attached to the hull? I see a couple possibilities for strut placement but was wondering what you imagined. Nice work and congrats on a worthy first posting. :-)
 
Why don't you make the nacelles integrated with the design and keep it more or less like that? I think it's beautiful.
 
Doh, I forgot to mention where the nacelles will actually go. Location wise, they'll be similar to the bottom pair of nacelles on the Prometheus. The pylons will connect just aft and below the saucer impulse engines, on the side of the deck you can see hanging below the saucer. Hope that helps :)
 
I remember seeing this on Subspace Comms. I must say that I was looking forward to commenting on this while waiting for my application to be accepted, that is: until my application was turned down.

So I must say that I am very psyched that you are here, since I love your work!:D

There are so many things I love about this ship: the hull shape, which looks somewhere in between that of the Nova and Prometheus, the Sovereign-like main deflector and cargo bay, and the heavy armament.

The hull shape looks vaguely like that of the Renner class, though considering that the Asguard is an Assault Cruiser, while the Renner class was an Escort Destroyer, so I doubt there was any intended relationship between the two.

Is the name by any supposed to be any reference to our favorite little grey men?
 
I wasn't aware SCN members had to be approved. I'm guess it's to prevent spambots and your application got nuked by mistake?

I had to google the Renner, so no intended relation. It's main hull reminds me of that Intrepid class concept. The Asgard design actually started off with the nacelles in the classic configuration, as this very early attempt at it shows (That was my first ever attempt at drawing a starship, makes me cringe every time I see it).

Although I'm a big Stargate fan, the name was chosen due to my interest in Norse mythology I had at the time.

Thanks for the compliments so far, I'm currently avoiding the issue of the nacelles by working out what the bridge module will be like, as that will help define the shape of the rest of deck 1.
 
Your very welcome, and I can see what you mean by the Independance in how far you've come. Still, I don't think it is necessarily something to be ashamed of, since you obviously have learned much from that initial design, and now look at what you can do.

And it is probably best to approach the nacelles with a lot of patience. Try looking at other peoples designs. It's what I do, and I think you might get some inspiration if you do so.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top