In A Piece of the Action, The Apple and Who Mourns for Adonis, phasers were used against ground targets, plus in Mirror, Mirror, they were planning to use phasers against the Halkans. Ground bombardment with both phasers and photon torpedoes is well established for Starfleet.
SInce when do I argue canon? You forget who you're talking to....often.Show me where else in canon they ever say this is an issue. If there is one instance that contradicts every other reference, it makes zero sense to side with the exception over the rule. Kirk's middle initial is not R. TOS is not set 900 years after Napoleon and Hamilton. And ships don't need to drop shields to fire the phasers.
Or there could have been some off screen issues that just botched things up that one day...repairs, etc
Yes, of course - good examples. I can't get enough of the Enterprise firing its main phasers. I was just trying to explain why the Enterprise might not have fired on the Gorn positions on Cestus III. "Starfleet didn't yet have that capability in S1 by the time of Arena," either for Doylist or Watsonian reasons, was the (far) weaker of the two explanations I proffered to suggest the Enterprise's failure to act.
(SPS = solar power satellite)Both types of high energy lasers (HEL)—continuous wave (CW) and pulsed—would be useful for space-to-earth targeting, but only from low earth orbits (LEO). This is because the Earth’s atmosphere acts to reduce their intensities, often by as much as a factor of 15 for some types of HEL(CW) devices. This atmospheric interaction reduces the effective range of HEL’s. Therefore, for Earth bombardment, HEL’s would have to be positioned in LEO (160 kilometers from surface of Terra) and receive their power by relay from the SPS system in geosynchronous Earth orbit (35,786 kilometers from surface of Terra)...
Particle beam weapons (PBW’s)... cannot be used for Earth bombardment from space. The Earth’s atmosphere interacts so strongly with all of these particle beam types that their effectiveness against ground targets is zilch.
Anyway, I'm more inclined to think that Kirk's one line sums up why they didn't even try orbital bombardment.
"Nevermind about me! Protect My Ship!"
Anyway, I'm more inclined to think that Kirk's one line sums up why they didn't even try orbital bombardment.
"Nevermind about me! Protect My Ship!"
I see a forth sign, something like "Environmental ???? Ramp ? Level ?, ?"
https://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/1x18hd/arenahd125.jpg
![]()
While futuristic, the signs in themselves aren't futuristic enough: it would make very little sense to specify "level" in a sign of that sort if "level"="floor" and there are half a dozen of those. Would each level have a separate staircase or what?
Rather, the signs would have to be display screens, displaying changing information, perhaps as requested, perhaps in the style of mall infoscreens. "This way to Life Support (now 70% off!)"; "Take Me To Level 5 For A Good Time"; "Replicators are waiting for you on level 3".
Timo Saloniemi
a doodad that not only transmitted the fake welcome of the Commodore, but also projected the image of an intact base.
similar to how the episode failed to explain how Fox could beam down with the shields up.
I work in a Data Center facility (well, work from home, for the past year now), and that is an extremely realistic thought. Hardware fails, or its replacement is installed with some procedural mistake, or an update is made to the software that inadvertently fouls up some functionality. And fixing it takes time. It happens a lot in real life.
Another thing I find curious about 'Armageddon' is some time after Scotty's remark about not being able to fire full phasers with their deflectors up, one of the Eminiarans says the Enterprise has moved out of range of their disruptors. This seems to be an explanation as to how Scotty can execute General Order 24 and fire on the planet.
If not, I wonder what the purpose was to say the ship has moved out of range.
Robert
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.