...but some are good, too. Stay positive!^No...please. Those SyFy shows are often horrible.
Moonves--I mean, CBS--is very pleased with the way things currently stand with Trek. Paramount revitalized the brand with Star Trek XI, and CBS can enjoy the benefits of that without having to invest in a new TV series.Sad to say, but KingDaniel is right.
I have heard Paramount owns the rights to Trek movies, and CBS owns the rights to TV Trek. Paramount's focus is the new JJ Abrams Star Trek movie time line. CBS is run by Les Moonves, and the likely hood of CBS producing a Trek show is very low.
If CBS would sell TV Trek to the SyFy Channel, or some other media more open to a new Trek show....but I digress.![]()
I can see what you mean. They own the rights to the series catalog from TOS to Enterprise, don't they? All they have to do is sit back and rake in the royalties from DVD sales, as well as on air re-runs. I wonder if they get any royalties for Hulu or other internet viewing?Moonves--I mean, CBS--is very pleased with the way things currently stand with Trek. Paramount revitalized the brand with Star Trek XI, and CBS can enjoy the benefits of that without having to invest in a new TV series.Sad to say, but KingDaniel is right.
I have heard Paramount owns the rights to Trek movies, and CBS owns the rights to TV Trek. Paramount's focus is the new JJ Abrams Star Trek movie time line. CBS is run by Les Moonves, and the likely hood of CBS producing a Trek show is very low.
If CBS would sell TV Trek to the SyFy Channel, or some other media more open to a new Trek show....but I digress.![]()
CBS holds the license to everything Trek--Paramount has the rights to make Star Trek movies, but only under license from CBS. As a result, if there's any kind of money involved with Trek, CBS gets a cut without even having to raise a finger.I can see what you mean. They own the rights to the series catalog from TOS to Enterprise, don't they? All they have to do is sit back and rake in the royalties from DVD sales, as well as on air re-runs. I wonder if they get any royalties for Hulu or other internet viewing?Moonves--I mean, CBS--is very pleased with the way things currently stand with Trek. Paramount revitalized the brand with Star Trek XI, and CBS can enjoy the benefits of that without having to invest in a new TV series.Sad to say, but KingDaniel is right.
I have heard Paramount owns the rights to Trek movies, and CBS owns the rights to TV Trek. Paramount's focus is the new JJ Abrams Star Trek movie time line. CBS is run by Les Moonves, and the likely hood of CBS producing a Trek show is very low.
If CBS would sell TV Trek to the SyFy Channel, or some other media more open to a new Trek show....but I digress.![]()
Does the world really need another Star Trek series? I'd watch it if one was created, but there is such a thing as too much. There are almost 30 seasons of Star Trek. That is quite a bit.
It would be nice to have at least 5 to 10 new Trek series. Have 3 to finish off the 24th century and and a few in the 25th century.
Would also be cool to have a Enterprise B series and also a Enterprise C series. Also a Stargazer series but probably won't happen anyways lol
are they going to make any new star trek series?
what about films - will we see any film with the series actors?
Does the world really need another Star Trek series? I'd watch it if one was created, but there is such a thing as too much. There are almost 30 seasons of Star Trek. That is quite a bit.
And it wouldn't have to be just a SyFy channel produced show...just syndicated there, and produced elsewhere.
Only CBS has the rights to produce Star Trek, and nobody produces shows for other outlets anymore. Not sure why, there's some business reason for it. They probably makes more $$ producing only for their own outlets. SyFy is owned by NBC-Universal.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.