Lindley said:
I think ruthless is a better term that evil.
An assertion not supported by the evidence.Sci said:
Lindley said:
I think ruthless is a better term that evil.
I don't. I think "evil" sums them up fairly well -- because, really, before anything else, Section 31 is concerned with its own power (hence their refusal to be exposed or to become accountable to the Federation government).
Motel Bill said:
An assertion not supported by the evidence.Sci said:
Lindley said:
I think ruthless is a better term that evil.
I don't. I think "evil" sums them up fairly well -- because, really, before anything else, Section 31 is concerned with its own power (hence their refusal to be exposed or to become accountable to the Federation government).
Calling Section 31 "evil" is to clothe them completely in black. I tend to see a hell of a lot of gray there...
Lindley said:
And if by doing so they stop a threat that no one else can?
That's the question that makes them interesting.
But the one time in canon that S31's immoral actions came to light was the discovery that the genocidal infection of the Great Link with the changeling virus. This was, in fact, the single most important factor in convincing the Dominion to surrender, and something the Great and Noble United Federation of Planets could never have officially condoned.Sci said:
Lindley said:
And if by doing so they stop a threat that no one else can?
That's the question that makes them interesting.
It's a BS claim. Any threat Section 31 can stop, the Federation proper can stop. There's may be a question about the morality of the methods involved, but that's not my primary objection to Section 31. The Federation itself has used morally questionable methods to achieve its objectives, too; what I object to is the lack of accountability to any higher authority.
Trent Roman said:
^ Uh, S31 did not end the war; their genocidal virus pushed the Founders into a policy of mutual annihilation (since they were going to die anyway) that would have resulted in massive slaughter if it hadn't been for Odo's act of mercy. The Federation had the Dominion beat logistically by the end of the series, which had nothing to do with the virus but with being able to deny them reinforcements from the Gamma Quadrant and the Romulans' entry into the war (there's your shades of grey); all 31 did was ensure that the Dominion would fight to the bitter end because they were dead one way or another. It was a vile plot perpetrated by vile people which cost more lives than it saved, and could have unleashed even greater tragedy.
Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
Trent Roman said:
^ Uh, S31 did not end the war; their genocidal virus pushed the Founders into a policy of mutual annihilation (since they were going to die anyway) that would have resulted in massive slaughter if it hadn't been for Odo's act of mercy.
[...] all 31 did was ensure that the Dominion would fight to the bitter end because they were dead one way or another.
It was a vile plot perpetrated by vile people which cost more lives than it saved, and could have unleashed even greater tragedy.
Motel Bill said:
Uh, no, wrong. The "annihilation" we saw on screen was aimed at the Dominion's allies, the Cardassians, not because of a virus, but because Damar pissed them off. There's nothing that indicates the emergence of the virus and the discovery that S31 was responsible had any effect on the Dominion's tactics; otherwise, one would have expected there would be a couple hundred occupied worlds around the AQ that would have been turned to radioactive slag weeks before the series finale.
You're talking about a state that breeds unquestioning clones for soldiers, who believe they are dead, and go into battle to reclaim their lives. The first we saw of the Jem'Hadar, they kamikazied the Odyssey, without a thought to their individual lives. The virus didn't make that happen, and I highly doubt that a healthy Female Changeling would have inevitably sued for peace because the cost of imposing order on the AQ at some point got too high.
But their intentions were good.![]()
Trent Roman said:(Note that the Founder was cured, then surrendered; and not the other way around, surrendering as a condition for being cured).
Lindley said:
She surrendered because once she knew a cure was possible, ending the war was the only way Odo would be allowed to take the cure back to the Great Link. Did you miss that?
Interesting, isn't it? The Federation claims to abhor Section 31's tactics, but when they need the dirty work done, they look the other way. It's a tidy little arrangement, wouldn't you say?
Angel4576 said:
^^ The easiest way of looking at it is to say that without the virus and the great link being infected, then the female changeling would have had no motivation to surrender her forces whatsoever. Quite likely they'd have fought to the last.
You can argue that it was the cure that ultimately convinced the Dominion to surrender, but without the virus in the first place there wouldn't have been any need for a cure, and the virus aside, the alliance would not have defeated the Dominion without incurring many more losses first.
Section 31 purport to be patriots, taking their mandate from section 31 of the Earth Starfleet charter. Why not just revoke it?
Angel4576 said:
Section 31 purport to be patriots, taking their mandate from section 31 of the Earth Starfleet charter. Why not just revoke it?
Trent Roman said:
Yes, she had motivation: saving herself. The Founders prize their own lives above pretty much everything else, as I've said, and once it become obvious that the Federation had the Dominion beat, there would have been no reason (for her) to keep fighting and risk her life in a bloody planetary invasion of Cardassia Prime. But since her life was forfeit anyway, as were that of her fellow Founders, due to the virus, she was determined to see that the inevitable victory would be as costly as possible, refusing to let the defenders above Cardassia Prime stand down. It's the virus that drove them to fight to the last--such self-sacrifice is not in the Founders' psychology, particularly not when no other Founders stand to benefit.
Trent Roman said:
Firstly, the Federation had the Dominion beat logistically by the end of the series; it was just a question of how costly that victory would prove. So the virus had no effect on the Dominion's defeat. Secondly, even if you thought that was the case, surely you can't place responsibility for Odo's actions at S31's doorstep? That's like congratulating George III on founding the United States, or praising Mohamed Atta for bringing democracy to Afghanistan. That a more righteous person stepped in to to heal the damage created by the madmen in S31 does not make those madmen responsible for the benefit of that act of mercy. Their goal, remember, was not peace with the Dominion, but the elimination of the Dominion through mass-murder. That peace was achieved in spite of their crimes cannot then be attributed to them. It was not their intent, and if it hadn't been for Odo, many more people (on both sides) would have died as a result of it.
Trent Roman said:
How? Section 31 is rogue. Even the Federation President, arguably the highest executive power in the state, does not have any control (or sometimes even knowledge) over them. Section 31 cannot be dismissed; it has to be dismantled, like any other paramilitary terrorist organization.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.