The price points are definitely a good thing. I'm very impressed they managed to get it out at prices that don't scream "rape me in the ass" like most new products (certainly not limited to Apple either).
The fact that the device follows the iPhone model of being a closed development system and can't multitask are major failings. I'm not sure why they chose to emulate the iPhone and not the Mac in both of these cases.
The price points are definitely a good thing. I'm very impressed they managed to get it out at prices that don't scream "rape me in the ass" like most new products (certainly not limited to Apple either).
The fact that the device follows the iPhone model of being a closed development system and can't multitask are major failings. I'm not sure why they chose to emulate the iPhone and not the Mac in both of these cases.
Because they don't want people to stop paying a thousand dollars for a low-end Macbook, period.
You think that apple will let JJ use them in the next trek film.![]()
I'm interested in the number of people who just don't understand this product. Watching the thread about it in TNZ... The sheer number of people who are going on and on about how laptops are better, how it's just a larger iPod Touch, that it's a failure, a "big toy" and such.
This is the opening salvo into a new market. One the "netbook" line was suposed to be going after with the first Eee PC back in 07 but failed and shifted to the mini-laptop idea it's running with now.
This is what the "netbook" should have been from the start really. A little more functionality in the iPad OS and you are there.
I'm interested in the number of people who just don't understand this product. Watching the thread about it in TNZ... The sheer number of people who are going on and on about how laptops are better, how it's just a larger iPod Touch, that it's a failure, a "big toy" and such.
This is the opening salvo into a new market. One the "netbook" line was suposed to be going after with the first Eee PC back in 07 but failed and shifted to the mini-laptop idea it's running with now.
This is what the "netbook" should have been from the start really. A little more functionality in the iPad OS and you are there.
Indeed, for a first gen product of a new market Apple is taping into, its not bad, but it could certainly benefit from more features. As more products are available in this market, and competition grows, this is going to be one interesting area in technology to keep an eye on IMO. I definitely think these types of products in this market has the potential to compete with and replace netbooks, if the features and price are right. Give it time and I think people will be running around with these Pad type devices instead of netbooks.
I'm interested in the number of people who just don't understand this product. Watching the thread about it in TNZ... The sheer number of people who are going on and on about how laptops are better, how it's just a larger iPod Touch, that it's a failure, a "big toy" and such.
This is the opening salvo into a new market. One the "netbook" line was suposed to be going after with the first Eee PC back in 07 but failed and shifted to the mini-laptop idea it's running with now.
This is what the "netbook" should have been from the start really. A little more functionality in the iPad OS and you are there.
I'm interested in the number of people who just don't understand this product. Watching the thread about it in TNZ... The sheer number of people who are going on and on about how laptops are better, how it's just a larger iPod Touch, that it's a failure, a "big toy" and such.
This is the opening salvo into a new market. One the "netbook" line was suposed to be going after with the first Eee PC back in 07 but failed and shifted to the mini-laptop idea it's running with now.
This is what the "netbook" should have been from the start really. A little more functionality in the iPad OS and you are there.
I wholly agree with this analysis... the iPad is cool, but it really is nothing more than an overgrown iPod Touch. That being said, if I were to purchase one, it would be as a replacement to my netbook and current iPod Touch, not as an actual tablet PC purchase. I agree that the iPad is probably a good and cheap introduction to owning an Apple computer, but it is still quite limited. It's a fancy iPod/eReader, and not a substitute for an MacBook or iMac.
But it really isn't an extension of the PC market so much as it is an extension of the mp3 and smartphone market. That is why the "tablet" and UMPC field has traditionally been so hampered in sales. This is not really meant to be full functioning PC. This is really, in the trekian sense, a Personal Access Device for multi-media entertainment. Music, TV, Movies, Books, Web. That's it's field. Does this over lap with the Personal Computer field, yes. Does this overlap with single media and some multi-media capable smartphone devices, sure.
But it's tapping into this new field. One where the single media mp3/ebook and early multi-media PMP have really only broken out in the last few years.
Tablet and UMPC's are heavy, power hungry, overly featured, and very expensive, thus have never sold that well. This new class of tablet offers the multi-media field without the overburden of traditional PC requirements which are not need in such a device. It's not meant to replace a PC, be it a laptop or a desk top. It's not meant to replace small media devices like the mp3 players or multi-media capable smartphones, but to complement those two by filling the "snack gap" between them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.