TV shows and movies will always have the DRM.
Is that because of the greater expense involved in creating the works, the potential for greater loss of income from pirated versions of those video based works?
Probably a bit of both.
TV shows and movies will always have the DRM.
Is that because of the greater expense involved in creating the works, the potential for greater loss of income from pirated versions of those video based works?
That ACTA treaty is worrisome as it could involve relaxed standards for monitoring the internet en masse.
The bill is largely being created in secret and may include provisions for internet filtering. Australia is already testing it's firewall (a nationwide firewall which nobody can opt out of) which is to filter "illegal content".
This bill could be very dangerous to internet freedoms in regards to privacy and could even be used to impose censorship (especially if a government was to decide that content depicting dissent was illegal content).
CuttingEdge100
I've been keeping an eye on ACTA news via michaelgeist.ca myself.
Professor Geist is on the law faculty at the University of Ottawa, and as near as he and his sources can tell, the nations that seem most interested in keeping the negotiations under wraps include Canada(to my personal sorrow), Japan, South Korea and the United States.
Here's a link to a quick search of some of the material he's generated in the course of covering the negotiations.
They didn't want to be dictated to, they were used to doing the dictating. So they let other outlets have it but not iTunes because Apple would not agree to their tiered price structure. I guess something changed that now.
And Apple has had DRM free music from EMI for a while now.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.