• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Anyone Else Tired of the "wars"?

Make love! Not War!
Lots of sweet, sweet love!

Damn it J, you beat me to it. I was born in the 60's, I remember the Flower Children and there slogan. :D








EDIT: Never post while talking on the phone, you could miss something while proofing. As it was Shamelessly pointed out, there was supposed to be their. :p
 
Last edited:
The notorious and bloody Eugenics Wars cost 37 million lives and led to one strongman with tight, oily pectoral muscles ruling a quarter of the globe. Those were some mighty dange...


Wait. Did...did they even happen? I don't...really remember them. But if they didn't...then how did...



Damn you, continuity porn!!! :klingon: :scream:
 
It's because we are americans [....] We are a war like people. We fetishize war.

Bingo. The practical utility of the metaphor that others have highlighted is certainly part of the story, but American culture also plays a part in its penchant for such metaphors.

That American culture is basically warlike (as opposed to explaining the nation's near-constant state of war with reference to extrinsic or structural factors) is now something approaching conventional wisdom. Robert Kagan, darling of both the Republican and Democrat establishments, recently acknowledged as much:

So even as the American people tire of one war, they’re getting ready for the next one [...] if this system is warlike, it’s [a] tendency that flows from the public.

This account is somewhat simplistic in that ignores the means by which American public opinion is shaped -- a process involving almost exclusively establishment, vested, and moneyed interests -- but it can at least be said that Americans are unusually receptive to the rhetoric of war.

Explaining why this is so is something folks could write entire books about, and indeed several have been written. Many would point to America's national origins in conflict (against the British that is, the natives are unlikely to get a look-in here) and it seems unlikely that the firearms ownership rate is an entirely unrelated phenomenon.

Perhaps less obvious is American preponderance itself: there is in the modern American experience no reason not to embrace war. War in the modern American experience is something that produces benefits (in that presumably the conflict serves American interests) without obvious costs. One could argue that many of America's wars (and "wars") have failed, but the question is whom have they failed? Objectively the War on Drugs may be a total disaster, but who is it a disaster for? Certainly not the politicians who instituted and maintain it, the agencies that prosecute it or the industry that supports them. Nor for the social classes that support those policies. And of course this applies more broadly: see Eisenhower, military-industrial-congressional complex, etc. The American people may suffer under wars and "wars", but America does not. All of which goes to support Data Holmes' point.

The other point that induced me to post here was the inclusion by the OP of the 'War on Drugs' on the list of things that [implicitly] aren't really wars. The War on Drugs is a war: ask Latin America. Or US Congressman Charles B. Rangel (D) whose 1988 New York Times op-ed could be considered a monument to the power of war rhetoric (both emotive and literal) in mainstream American political discourse. Excerpt:

If we really want to do something about drug abuse, let's end this nonsensical talk about legalization right now.

Let's put the pressure on our leaders to first make the drug problem a priority issue on the national agenda, then let's see if we can get a coordinated national battle plan that would include the deployment of military personnel and equipment to wipe out this foreign-based national security threat.

So, yeah: war!
 
Make love! Not War!
Lots of sweet, sweet love!

Damn it J, you beat me to it. I was born in the 60's, I remember the Flower Children and there slogan. :D


EDIT: Never post while talking on the phone, you could miss something while proofing. As it was Shamelessly pointed out, there was supposed to be their. :p

Flower children were awesome. Sure they didn't bathe, but by god you got some sweet, sweet, sookie sookie out of it. Also, the clap.

Make love! Not War!
Lots of sweet, sweet love!
Then along came AIDS a decade later, and the slogan was “Make war, not love. War’s safer!”

I still prefer love over war. Plus, there are always condoms. It's like wrapping your valentine in a latex envelope of love, and having it ribbed, for her pleasure.
 
The War on Jersey Shore should be waged...and with extreme prejudice. Snooki is the greatest danger to our children as well as our children's children. No expense should be spared in the drive to victory over the greasy washboard abs of The Situation. They are the work of the Jersey Devil and an affront to all that America stands for.
 
The notorious and bloody Eugenics Wars cost 37 million lives and led to one strongman with tight, oily pectoral muscles ruling a quarter of the globe. Those were some mighty dange...

Wait. Did...did they even happen? I don't...really remember them. But if they didn't...then how did...

Damn you, continuity porn!!! :klingon: :scream:

Bill Clinton could have been known as our greatest wartime president for defeating Khan and the other Augments in his first term, but all those accomplishments were forgotten by his second thanks to his lasciviousness. The penis mightier than the sword, at least in terms of media coverage.
 
The notorious and bloody Eugenics Wars cost 37 million lives and led to one strongman with tight, oily pectoral muscles ruling a quarter of the globe. Those were some mighty dange...

Wait. Did...did they even happen? I don't...really remember them. But if they didn't...then how did...

Damn you, continuity porn!!! :klingon: :scream:

Bill Clinton could have been known as our greatest wartime president for defeating Khan and the other Augments in his first term, but all those accomplishments were forgotten by his second thanks to his lasciviousness. The penis mightier than the sword, at least in terms of media coverage.

He was if you read those two novels by Greg Cox IIRC.
 
Never!

snes-sega.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top