You like men. Manly men. They're men in tights. Yes.
You can burst into song now.![]()
Even though i'm fairly certain of my sexuality, you never know, one day I might decide i'm attracted to a man...but I think thats unlikely!
As a gay man, the whole concept [I have to admit] of suddenly finding someone 'attractive' of the same or opposite sex when they have an already very well identified sexual orientation seems bizarre to me.
I definitely find some men attractive; I just can't see seeking them out.
Honestly Tom you're obsessed with dicks.
Honestly Tom you're obsessed with dicks.
I'm just wondering why Tom is so interested in other people's preferences.
I'm just wondering why Tom is so interested in other people's preferences.
Like most men, I'm simply curious. You know like the curiosity and fascination some people have with pornography.
Honestly Tom you're obsessed with dicks.
Ah, you think. Kinda like the same 'obsession,' that some straight men have with boobs.It's called healthy sexuality.
I definitely find some men attractive; I just can't see seeking them out.
So hypothetically - right time, right place, right guy - and you'd have no problem playing with a man's dick? In fact you'd enjoy it?
I like porn, though I can't say I'm all that interested in what kind of porn other people like.
Then why the very gay avatar? A cute blonde, in a yellow and blue sexy outfit which screams gay, is quite the turn on for a gay man like me. YMMVi'm so straight you could use me as a ruler.
Says the immature boy posting on a Star Trek board?!Since when do you get to decide someone else's sexuality?You cannot call yourself omnisexual and then pick and choose what you are attracted to. Suck it up, you are bi
Well until you people start figuring this stuff out for yourselves, I'm going to have to carry the responsibility.
If you all spent less time watching Star Trek and more time learning what the prefixes 'omni-' and 'pan'- meant, we wouldn't be in this situation.![]()
In reality Robert I find more modern sexuality fascinating. I'm over 40 now and when I grew up most people grew up straight and if you were gay you were encouraged to stay in the closet. I grew up in a world pre Will and Grace where homosexuality was much less accepted.
In today's world younger people - seem more more comfortable with sexual experimentation and it's a foreign concept for me - and had you read my other posts on the subject - it's difficult for me to understand how men [since I'm a gay man] would so easily slide between sexual experiences between the sexes.
For me my taste and desire for men is very set - so I'm just trying to understand [especially younger folks] ability to have sexual experiences with both men and women without having a more rigid desire for one sex.
Does this make sense? Does my 'curiosity,' make more sense?
Also, with regard to my obsession with dicks - also in my experience men who are OK with a male-male sexual experience but also primarily identify as 'straight,' typically are unwilling to be an active participant in gay sex but just get their dick sucked. Because most men will allow virtually anyone to suck their dick.
I've also been attracted to cross-dressers and male-to-female transsexuals. I doubt I could actually date a cross-dresser that didn't identify as female on the inside but I might be willing to make out with them. When it comes to my sexuality I've adapted the philosophy of "We'll make it up as we go along" and I just roll with it.
So if I understand you correctly so long as a man dressed as a woman most of the time you'd be ok playing with his dick?
I'd also like to go on the record as saying chromosones are over-rated. All an XX or an XY means is that you were statistically most likely to have been born with certain parts. People come with built-in gender identities and then are sociliazed to make their biult in genders as close as possible to what society dictates as the norm.
I'd also like to go on the record as saying chromosones are over-rated. All an XX or an XY means is that you were statistically most likely to have been born with certain parts. People come with built-in gender identities and then are sociliazed to make their biult in genders as close as possible to what society dictates as the norm.
The TNG episode Outcast tried to deal with that and IMHO failed miserably as Trek's first attempt to deal with homosexuality/'omni sexuality,' on so many different levels.
IMHO the series could have done much better in making Wesley for example a gay character.
Some of the writers actually fought for normalizing homosexuality in TNG, but they were shut down by Berman/Paramount. They wanted to do things like have same-sex couples holding hands and such in Ten Forward. Just making it out to not be a big deal at all, as it should be in the 24th century. "The Outcast" was the closest the producers and studio were willing to go on the homosexuality issue.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.