Does Bill Handel typically cite legal precedent from the [url=https://youtu.be/g4GoWLIV23A?t=2m15s]Jim Carrey movie Liar Liar[/url]?For goodness sakes, about fifteen years ago there was a burglar here in the U.S. (I don't remember the details or where) who was in a guy's roof and he broke and fell threw a skylight. He sued the home owners for his injuries and the court awarded the burglar because the home owner hadn't provided adequate protection for somebody on the roof who could face the same accident. Which is, of course, an accident you have while ROBBING somebody.
Greta: A couple years ago my friend had a burglar on her roof, a burglar. He fell through the kitchen skylight, landed on a butcher's knife, cutting his leg. The burglar sued my friend, he sued my friend. And because of guys like you HE WON. My friend had to pay the burglar $6,000. Is that justice?
Fletcher: No. I'd'a' got him ten.
The real case the oft-cited myth is based on was quite different.
- The incident happened in 1982 in Redding, California, and involved an eighteen-year-old who climbed up on the roof of the Enterprise High School gym to take some floodlights so he and his friends could allegedly play basketball with a lighted court (police claim they were just stealing them).
- The kid fell through a set of skylights that were painted over black to match the color of the roof and were thus completely invisible at night. He fell 27-feet to the floor and was rendered quadriplegic and mute as a result.
- There had been a similar incident of a student at a nearby school in the same district (and with the same design) also falling through a painted over skylight earlier in the year and falling to his death, so all the schools in the district had been ordered to board up the skylights to both make them visible and to prevent anyone from falling through.
- The school in question failed to board over the skylight or take any action to make it more visible or provide any warning for well over six months after the original accident and subsequent order to correct the problem.
- The kid did sue for millions of dollars, but he was not "awarded" anything by the court, because the school district decided to settle the case first. The attorneys got most of the money and what the family got barely pay for all his medical expenses, meaning he would have to be covered for the balance by the state anyway.
- The case became the catalyst for tort reform that made it impossible to sue for injuries incurred during the commission of felony crimes, including criminal trespassing or burglary.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1985-11-17/news/0340390083_1_shasta-district-skylights-bodine
https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/the-burglar-and-the-skylight-another-debunking-that-isnt/
So it wasn't a homeowner being sued but a school district, it wasn't a burglary but rather criminal trespassing and petty theft, the school did exhibit some negligent behavior in failing to correct the problem after a student had previously been injured the same way, the court didn't award the kid anything but the school district decided to settle rather than push the issue, and as a result of the case being brought at all it inspired immediate tort reform to prevent it from happening again.
So like most of these stories, a mix of exaggeration and outright lies, and cynicism about the legal system when things weren't nearly as bad as they seem.