^ I think it was pretty clear in the episode that she was not.
No, Q Junior and all the other Q have known Amanda for a long time at the beginning of The Eternal Tide, per both "True Q" and "The Q and the Grey". Then she is erased from the multiverse.The Voyager novel The Eternal Tide gives another explanation, that Amanda was erased from the multiverse somehow or other.
I guess so. But it appears from canon Star Trek that the Q can manipulate their bodies on the space-time continuum any way they want, including selectively registering on starship sensors.I always just assumed as others have stated, that since Amanda Rogers wasn't born in the Q Continuum, our buddy Q doesn't count her in his description of the Q's lack of offspring. One of the reasons he was investigating Amanda was to find out if she was a 'True Q' or some sort of bizarre hybrid. We see how Q mate in 'The Q and the Grey', I assume Amanda's parents did it the old-fashioned way.
Which begs the question - when a Q takes another form, does he/she actually BECOME that form? Like down to DNA and everything? Q's concern about Amanda's possible hybrid status would seem to suggest that they do.
Enterprise1701 said:Either way, Amanda had a normal space-time body linked to the Q Continuum.
it appears from canon Star Trek that the Q can manipulate their bodies on the space-time continuum any way they want, including selectively registering on starship sensors.
Once erased, nobody had any memory of her. The implication being that the "Q and the Grey" we saw was in the post-erasure version of the timeline.No, Q Junior and all the other Q have known Amanda for a long time at the beginning of The Eternal Tide, per both "True Q" and "The Q and the Grey". Then she is erased from the multiverse.The Voyager novel The Eternal Tide gives another explanation, that Amanda was erased from the multiverse somehow or other.
Kirsten Beyer is on record saying she ignored all the other Q novels when she wrote The Eternal Tide. Novelverse continuity is somewhat flexible - previous novels are contradicted by some authors and then sometimes later referenced by others.In the earlier-published TNG novel The Q Continuum: Q-Space by Greg Cox, Lady Q tells Beverly Crusher that Amanda Rogers doesn't count because "that creature was conceived in a primitive, strictly humanoid fashion." I guess the Star Trek novel authors, like many people here, have gone with the "doesn't count" explanation.
Time in the Q Continuum runs backwards (the way it is suppoed to), a process we puny Humans could never understand.
![]()
Nope. http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?p=10505992#post10505992Once erased, nobody had any memory of her. The implication being that the "Q and the Grey" we saw was in the post-erasure version of the timeline.No, Q Junior and all the other Q have known Amanda for a long time at the beginning of The Eternal Tide, per both "True Q" and "The Q and the Grey". Then she is erased from the multiverse.The Voyager novel The Eternal Tide gives another explanation, that Amanda was erased from the multiverse somehow or other.
Well apparently by the physics developed in the novels, the Q Continuum can be erased from existence, and so when Amanda Rogers traveled to the "Endgame" timeline, she blinked out of existence. Read Kirsten Beyer's 2012 VOY novel The Eternal Tide for all the details. It's an excellent novel.How exactly the hell does a *Q* get erased from the timeline? I thought they existed completely outside of it.
Yup. Plus, in KRAD's 2007 TNG novel Q&A, Q reveals that he caused the quantum fissure that Worf encountered in "Parallels".I think that's the distinction between the 'timeline' and the 'multiverse'. If I understand the concept of the latter correctly, the 'multiverse' consists of all timelines in all universes. Basically, everything that has been, is, and will ever be.
"Tapestry" gives a hint that Q have the ability to at least view, if not be a part of events in other timelines in other universes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.