I got into Star Trek as a child in the late-80s and early-90s watching repeats on BBC2 and absolutely loved it--much to the chagrin of my family. I loved it so much that when I learnt of TNG the very concept was an affront to me; how could they have Star Trek with Kirk and co? But I eventually started watching TNG and equally fell in love with it, even to the point where I was picking Picard over Kirk.
Since those days, I haven't gone back and revisited TOS, as it holds a very special place in my heart (as seen through the eyes of a child). The characters, stories, action, romance, friendship, laughter and overall campy goodness, are an amalgamation of my appreciation and love for TOS, something that I'm afraid of damaging going back and watching them now after 20+ years (with higher expectations of special effects, acting ability, and overall tone, not to mention a more pickier eye).
I'm asking if anyone else is in the same boat, or if you were then bit the bullet and went back and watched them?
Apparently, my lack of up-to-date familiarity with TOS could be the reason I don't "get" the NuTrek films![]()
The other aspect is that I find William Shatner's strange mix of hilarious overacting and occasional really good acting to be much more entertaining now. If Captain Pike had stayed in command, the show would be almost unwatchable. William Shatner made this series, and it stands the test of time largely because of him.
TOS as a whole suits Shatner's acting style because everything was cranked to 11. The colors, the melodrama, the obligatory fist-fight scenes, etc... Compared to TOS, the TNG-era shows feel like sitting down to watch a quiet babbling brook.
TOS as a whole suits Shatner's acting style because everything was cranked to 11. The colors, the melodrama, the obligatory fist-fight scenes, etc... Compared to TOS, the TNG-era shows feel like sitting down to watch a quiet babbling brook.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.