The artist's burden. What we treasure is a pain to them.
Yes, the vast majority of fans who want the OT without all the bells and whistles added in the 90s and beyond want "remastered and cleaned up versions" of those movies, and most of them would probably be perfectly fine with subtle FX work such as cleaning up matte lines. If Lucasfilm had produced the Despecialized editions, and sold them as alternatives to the (multiple versions of the) Special Editions, that same vast majority of fans would be happy. Some would still want to collect straight-up unrestored scans of initial prints or whatever, but they'd be another story.
Anyhow, good on Lucasfilm for letting preservationists and tinkerers such as Harmy and Adywan quietly do their things, and not hounding them for it. Praise to both Lucas and Kennedy there.
That's basically what Harmy did with the Despecialized editions, years ago. I'm sure it was a lot of work, but a small number of people did it for free, on their own time:
Welcome to why I have VHS.which gave the fans what they wanted - the chance to see the Original Trilogy as many of us remembered it...
Nice one - great to have options and choice, isn't it?Welcome to why I have VHS.
That's how I remember it.
Indeed. I have a strong fondness for this format plus it's cheaper.Nice one - great to have options and choice, isn't it?
(and some pretty cool artwork and box sets back in the day - for the VHS, Beta, Laserdisc releases etc)
Most of the changes are cosmetic and come down to personal preference of aesthetics. They are as close to a non-issue as a thing can come and probably hit closer to the extreme end of a first world problem.I have to admit that I give zero f**** about any alterations that George Lucas made to these movies. JRR Tolkien revised The Hobbit after the fact, and he's considered one of the greatest creatives who ever lived. As long as the larger story doesn't change, I just don't care.
I mean, I don't even think the Greedo shoots first thing is a change of any relevance whatsoever. The badassery of that scene wasn't in the shooting, it was after the shooting -- when Han calmly stands up stares down the room, throws the bartender some coin while apologizing for the mess and walking out the door as if it were it everyday occurrence. I find the whole "who shot first" thing to be a complete non-issue, and I always have.
Which unaltered version of Episode 4 though? The original print? The 80s edit with A New Hope Added? the stereo mix or the mono mix with slightly different dialogue in some places?
![]()
List of changes in Star Wars re-releases
The following are partial lists of changes in Star Wars re-releases. The commercial success of Star Wars has given George Lucas the opportunity to tinker with his original trilogy, now called Episode IV A New Hope, Episode V The Empire Strikes Back, and Episode VI Return of the Jedi. In a...starwars.fandom.com
I have to admit that I give zero f**** about any alterations that George Lucas made to these movies. JRR Tolkien revised The Hobbit after the fact, and he's considered one of the greatest creatives who ever lived. As long as the larger story doesn't change, I just don't care.
I mean, I don't even think the "Greedo shoots first" thing is a change of any relevance whatsoever. The badassery of that scene wasn't in the shooting, it was after the shooting -- when Han calmly stands up stares down the room, throws the bartender some coin while apologizing for the mess and walking out the door as if it were it everyday occurrence. I find the whole "who shot first" thing to be a complete non-issue, and I always have.
Dissatisfied with his work.Never understood why Lucas felt the need to continually lie about the scene - or continue to change it.
Dissatisfied with his work.
For an anxious person, probably not.The sixth time is the charm, then?![]()
He's a bit of a dummy about it?Greedo is holding the gun the wrong way?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.