• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Advocates for disabled to protest "Tropic Thunder"

nx1701g

Admiral
Admiral
Saw this on Yahoo:

Advocates for disabled to protest "Tropic Thunder":
Groups that advocate for the disabled called on Sunday for a national boycott of the Ben Stiller comedy "Tropic Thunder," citing what they say is its negative portrayal of people with intellectual disabilities.


"We are asking people not to go to the movie and hope to bring a consciousness to people about using derogatory words about this population," said Peter Wheeler, spokesman for Special Olympics, one of 22 disability groups nationwide protesting the satire.
The film, directed by Stiller, will be released on Wednesday by Viacom Inc's Paramount Pictures and its DreamWorks unit. [CONTINUED]

So do you think this will have any effect on the film?
 
While I will not be seeing it, it is for entirely other reasons. None of the cast nor the director are a draw to me. I however hope this does not affect it or it's success. If art had to bow down to every pressure group that came along, nothing would ever get done.

Can you imagine the mess it would be if Star Trek XI had to meet the wants of everybody on this board alone? LOL
 
I don't think it will affect it too much. I saw a screening of the movie a couple of weeks ago and thought it was great. What specific part of the movie are they protesting as inappropriate? I can't think of any situation where they picked on the disabled.
 
I guess they're offended by Tug Speedman's "Simple Jack" and how Tropic Thunder points out the kind of mentally retarded roles actors play that the Oscars wet themselves over.
 
I guess they're offended by Tug Speedman's "Simple Jack" and how Tropic Thunder points out the kind of mentally retarded roles actors play that the Oscars wet themselves over.
Apparently there is a part in the trailer where they call him "retard" that's their major problem.

The movie sees Stiller playing actor Tugg Speedman, who takes on the role of Simple Jack, a mentally handicapped man. One promotional clip for the movie sees the character referred to as a "retard".

Activists have claimed that the language constitutes "hate speech" and initially called for a boycott of the movie.
 
Oh yeah, duh, I'm surprised I didn't remember that. I could see how some might be offended by that part of the movie, but I thought it was all pretty hilarious. I don't think a big deal should be made of it though. Just don't go see the movie if you think it's so offensive.
 
Oh yeah, duh, I'm surprised I didn't remember that. I could see how some might be offended by that part of the movie, but I thought it was all pretty hilarious. I don't think a big deal should be made of it though. Just don't go see the movie if you think it's so offensive.
I'm with you, I couldn't give a shit about it, and I attended a special needs school. Besides, how does calling him a retard become any more offensive than the million other times you hear it in movies and TV shows?
 
Saw this on Yahoo:

Advocates for disabled to protest "Tropic Thunder":
Groups that advocate for the disabled called on Sunday for a national boycott of the Ben Stiller comedy "Tropic Thunder," citing what they say is its negative portrayal of people with intellectual disabilities.


"We are asking people not to go to the movie and hope to bring a consciousness to people about using derogatory words about this population," said Peter Wheeler, spokesman for Special Olympics, one of 22 disability groups nationwide protesting the satire.
The film, directed by Stiller, will be released on Wednesday by Viacom Inc's Paramount Pictures and its DreamWorks unit. [CONTINUED]

So do you think this will have any effect on the film?

... Wait what?
 
I guess they're offended by Tug Speedman's "Simple Jack" and how Tropic Thunder points out the kind of mentally retarded roles actors play that the Oscars wet themselves over.

Do they point that out? Good on them because that shit is ridiculous.
 
I read somewhere too that Downey Jr. is worried about the NAACP because he plays and African American in this film.
 
I read somewhere too that Downey Jr. is worried about the NAACP because he plays and African American in this film.

I'll have to see if I can dig it up, but I had heard that many black folks loved RDJ's performance in this and that Stiller even screened it for the NAACP.

I suspect if the NAACP had any real problems with it we would've heard from them by now.
 
^^The actual African American character in the film doesn't fail to point out the absurdity of Robert Downey Jr's role.

You know, the more I think about it, the more I think this is the kind of film that anyone who is easily offended about any topic should not see. It's a little more risque than Ben Stiller's past films.
 
^^The actual African American character in the film doesn't fail to point out the absurdity of Robert Downey Jr's role.

You know, the more I think about it, the more I think this is the kind of film that anyone who is easily offended about any topic should not see. It's a little more risque than Ben Stiller's past films.

Yeah. There's that and it's just thar RDJ is just simply awesome at it.

:lol:

"Wait. What do you mean by 'you people?"
"What do YOU mean by 'you people?!"
 
It's insane how much the hair changes his look. You know it's him but you just can't see it until the hair comes off.
 
It's insane how much the hair changes his look. You know it's him but you just can't see it until the hair comes off.

Yeah. The make-up work on him is incredible and his performance is great too (from the trailers.)

When did RDJ become such a great, used, awesome actor? :lol:

I'm going to a sneak of this tomorrow night. Expect my review then.

:)
 
When did RDJ become such a great, used, awesome actor? :lol:

When was he not?

(Unless I'm not quite grasping your meaning of the word "used." I don't quite know what you mean there, but as for great and awesome, he's always been both of those things.)

I read somewhere too that Downey Jr. is worried about the NAACP because he plays and African American in this film.

It WAS a big "thing" a few months ago. Not with the NAACP, specifically, but lots of people were voicing discomfort with the idea. I think that once people learned he was going through the change IN the movie (and not just playing a regular black guy with no acknowledgement of who he was) then the furor kind of died down.

But mental note: If you're gonna have a white guy play a black guy, you have to acknowledge that in the movie, or people will get upset. We saw it start up a little before it died down.
 
When did RDJ become such a great, used, awesome actor? :lol:

When was he not?

(Unless I'm not quite grasping your meaning of the word "used." I don't quite know what you mean there, but as for great and awesome, he's always been both of those things.)

I dunno. Just seems like he hasn't been around a whole lot or anything big and major and I, personally, have never been impressed with his acting talents.

(Looking at his IMDB page the last thing he's been in that I've seen/was worth seeing (before Iron Man) was Bowfinger.)

But seems like between this year's Iron Man and Tropic Thunder he's become more "main stream" (again?).
 
When Downey had his downfall, his leading roles dried up so he had to do a lot of supporting roles (Wonder Boys, Bowfinger), some which were still good parts, just not lead roles. He also did a straight-to-video flick called Danger Zone with Billy Zane as the star(!!!!!). His season on Ally McBeal was part of his career rehab. Then he started getting lead roles in small movies like Zodiac and Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang. Even though no one saw them, they were critically acclaimed and thus he was on his way back to the bigtime.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top