It's a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake!!
Someone had to say it.![]()
I did. Upthread.
It's a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake!!
Someone had to say it.![]()
It's a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake!!
Someone had to say it.![]()
I did. Upthread.
OK, that main part that says to me that it's a hoax, is the comment about being out in time for Star trek's anniversary. What anniversary? People don't typically celebrate 48th anniversary of a franchise and the 50th won't be until 2016.
I take any news that breaks on April 1st with a huge grain of salt. That quote by Abrams sounds especially fake.
It's unlikely. We authors can't release "unofficial" versions of these manuscripts because they don't belong to us. As the product of work-for-hire agreements, the story outlines and manuscripts are all the property of Star Trek, and it's against the law for us to give away someone else's property without permission.Could these ever get unofficial releases a la Margaret Wander Bonanno's original version of Probe, or is Bad Robot more likely to crack down on that sort of thing than Paramount?
It sounds like in cases like this, if they never intend to publish the work, your only recourse is to lock your hard copy in a safe and wait for it to be discovered in 200 years.Mine was tailored so precisely to the characters and setting as established in the movie that I'm not sure there's anything I could salvage from More Beautiful Than Death other than the title.![]()
It's precisely the kind of cruel practical jokes like this that makes me want to pledge not to go anywhere near the Net on this annual occasion.
What we can do, potentially, is cannibalize elements of our Abramsverse novels for other Trek books. I think Greg has already done so with some aspects of his, and I've given some thought to the possibility of doing so with mine.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.