• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Abrams: "60% more trekking; 80% more Stars."

Newspaper Taxi

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
J.J. Abrams has always been a core believer in the basic elements of Star Trek, as made obvious by his desire to go back to the days of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. This has caused many Star Trek fans to worry. While few have trouble with Star Trek returning to its roots many people worry just what Abrams defines as the series roots.

"Did you watch Star Trek: Nemesis?," Abrams asks. "I did. I was disappointed. I'm one of those people who sees all the little details -- maybe even too many of the details; I get carried away. There were 53 stars in the final battle. 53 STARS. When I pay eight bucks to see a movie entitled 'Star Trek' I expect to see more stars than what I get in the backyard everynight for free."

Just how many stars are we talking, J.J?

"Tons," He says. "In almost every scene I asked the Special Effects crew to go back and add in twice the amount of stars. Sometimes I even made them go back three or four times, adding in more stars. During the climax of the film there are so many stars onscreen that Kirk and Spock are bathed in light and seem to resemble beings of light, deities, Gods -- which they are to me. They're the Trinity, after all -- The Captain, the Doctor, and the Vulcan Host."

Of course, Abrams hasn't forgotten about the "Trek" part of Star Trekking.

"All too often," He starts out, "We get a Star Trek movie where they're just sitting around. Not in this one. I can say that at least three-quarters of the movie features the characters onscreen physically walking or running. I also tried to increase the amount of back-packs and water bottles to emphasize the amount of trekking present in the movie. By the end of the movie you'll be glad that you're already sitting down!"

"When the movie finally comes out next year, I think everyone's going to be satisfied," he concludes.
 
uh, what? is this supposed to be a parody? If so, its sort of lost on me. It needs to be more over-the-top. what's with the stars-bathing-them-like-deities joke, we're making fun of someone for loving the trinity (kirk/spock/mccoy)? i havent been following all of abrams comments' so clearly something has gone over my head here.
 
I was wondering "Umm.... Where is this being quoted from?"

I also noticed Spock described as the "Vulcan Host", which isn't the religious trinity reference the writer intended, since trinitarians sometimes use the term "holy ghost".

If this was a parody, it was poorly conceived, poorly executed, and poorly typed. (And let's hope it ISN'T legit, because that makes things even worse.)

Overall, out of a possible ten points, I rate this post a -27.
 
I thought it was clever (though I'd fix the Vulcan Host/Ghost thing--hardly a deal-breaker).

I like the user-name, too. (I used to have an avatr that was Fred Mertz getting his mind blown. Still miss it.)
 
I thought it was clever (though I'd fix the Vulcan Host/Ghost thing--hardly a deal-breaker).

I like the user-name, too. (I used to have an avatr that was Fred Mertz getting his mind blown. Still miss it.)
Might not be quite identical, but try this:
blownmertz.png
 
I considered putting the Vulcan Ghost in but I figuerd since they revived Spock in the third movie that wouldn't really fit.
 
I like how so far there I've counted at least two news parodies that either include Beatles references or are posted by someone whose screenname is a Beatles reference.
 
...(I used to have an avatr that was Fred Mertz getting his mind blown. Still miss it.)

Are you sure your avatar wasn't one of "Bub" from "My Three Sons" getting HIS mind blown?



Actually, I am. In the video (for Shatner's "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds") we see Fred in the backseat of a car, next to Ethel, with Lucy and James Kirk (in the place of Ricky Ricardo) in the front seat:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-yy2URAYqU

(Of course, this being the TrekBBS, I suppose a case will made that it could have been--nay, was--Bub, in the car because he and Ethel are having an affair. This would then be followed by pages of rancorous debate, with the occasional superior drive-by post lobbed in smugly [signed with a :cool:] and one or two warnings for flaming. Ahh, the BBS...)
 
J.J. Abrams has always been a core believer in the basic elements of Star Trek, as made obvious by his desire to go back to the days of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. This has caused many Star Trek fans to worry. While few have trouble with Star Trek returning to its roots many people worry just what Abrams defines as the series roots.

"Did you watch Star Trek: Nemesis?," Abrams asks. "I did. I was disappointed. I'm one of those people who sees all the little details -- maybe even too many of the details; I get carried away. There were 53 stars in the final battle. 53 STARS. When I pay eight bucks to see a movie entitled 'Star Trek' I expect to see more stars than what I get in the backyard everynight for free."

Just how many stars are we talking, J.J?

"Tons," He says. "In almost every scene I asked the Special Effects crew to go back and add in twice the amount of stars. Sometimes I even made them go back three or four times, adding in more stars. During the climax of the film there are so many stars onscreen that Kirk and Spock are bathed in light and seem to resemble beings of light, deities, Gods -- which they are to me. They're the Trinity, after all -- The Captain, the Doctor, and the Vulcan Host."

Of course, Abrams hasn't forgotten about the "Trek" part of Star Trekking.

"All too often," He starts out, "We get a Star Trek movie where they're just sitting around. Not in this one. I can say that at least three-quarters of the movie features the characters onscreen physically walking or running. I also tried to increase the amount of back-packs and water bottles to emphasize the amount of trekking present in the movie. By the end of the movie you'll be glad that you're already sitting down!"

"When the movie finally comes out next year, I think everyone's going to be satisfied," he concludes.

:lol::lol:
 
The first giveaway was the lack of hyperlink. Add even a fake link and I would have given it 8 out of 10. :vulcan:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top