i can believe it. question answered, nothing to see here folks!
It was pretty lame, actually. Heavy-handed, simplistic, clumsily written and uninteresting.
Any competition for best of the TOS-based films is limited to the first four...and number three really is never in the running.
Quality is not determined by the number of people who do or do not like a film. It is determined by whether or not I like a film.I think TSFS is good, but not at the top. And as for TMP being in the competition for the top spot, outside of folks at this site, I haven't seen a Trek fan who would seriously consider it.
TUC was great by the way, except for some characterization issues with the crew suddenly becoming racists.
Quality is not determined by the number of people who do or do not like a film. It is determined by whether or not I like a film.I think TSFS is good, but not at the top. And as for TMP being in the competition for the top spot, outside of folks at this site, I haven't seen a Trek fan who would seriously consider it.
TUC was great by the way, except for some characterization issues with the crew suddenly becoming racists.
TMP is a good film. It is not a great film, but it could have been had it not been hamstrung by so many production problems.
TUC is an okay film. It really does feel more dated than any of the other TOS films, yes even TVH with it's 1986 time traveling. The writing on TUC was just plain awful. It must be Denny Martin Flynn's influence, because Meyer's writing was usually pretty darn good.
Even fans who have problems with the script should be able to acknowledge the essential goodness of Cliff Eidelman's music, and in particular the way the opening-title music grows from the unadorned six-note motif, eventually punctuated by the Praxis explosion. I only have a VHS version but still recall how good this sounded in the theater in 1991.
Eh. I think Eidelman's score is so-so. As has been pointed out, it's a bit derivative of previous works. But, mostly, it's just a taste difference. Eidelman's score is rather dark and brooding most of the time, which fits the general tone of the film, but is not my general preference. I much prefer the brighter scores of the earlier films. Even Horner's scores, which Meyer didn't want to consist of big brassy marches like Goldsmith's, still are much more uplifting than Eidleman's.Even fans who have problems with the script should be able to acknowledge the essential goodness of Cliff Eidelman's music, and in particular the way the opening-title music grows from the unadorned six-note motif, eventually punctuated by the Praxis explosion. I only have a VHS version but still recall how good this sounded in the theater in 1991.
All hail The Undiscovered Country, the best of the TOS films!
I couldn't wait to see TUC and I thought it was great.
BUT
There are things I notice now that I never noticed at 12. I won't go into them at length, mostly because I don't feel like it. One thing that strikes me is the wild degree they took cultural references and the way they were attributed. The President was directly quoting Reagan in the middle of the film and Kennedy at the end. Why would "Only Nixon can go to China" be a Vulcan proverb? Shakespeare in the original Klingon. "Guess who's coming to dinner." Are the Klingons supposed to be Soviets or African Americans? Is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle really an ancestor of Spock's?
Another thing I have a hard time wrapping my head around is how could enemies become allies to stay enemies? Would these people trust each other long enough to carry out a conspiracy? I bet this was also ripped off a headline but I don't know what the headline was.
On another note, I don't know what Cliff Eidelman's score is derivative of (honestly, I'm sure it is and I don't disbelieve, but nothing's jumping to my mind right now so examples would be helpful) but this is one of my favorite soundtracks for a Star Trek movie, up there with TMP and FC.
For a brief moment in the theater, 20 years ago, when Scotty went to the air vent, I wondered if he was in on the conspiracy.
Meant to be? Yes. But they fail at being humorous in almost all cases.Some of those lines you allude to are meant to be humorous.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.