• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A train ride from New York City to London?

Gaith

Vice Admiral
Admiral
It may some day be possible (MSNBC):
LONDON — A train could one day make a journey of more than 5,000 miles from New York City to London, after senior Russian officials reportedly backed a plan to build a 65-mile tunnel between North America and Asia.

The Times newspaper in the U.K. said that idea to construct a $60 billion tunnel under the Bering Strait was this week backed by some President Dmitry Medvedev’s top officials.
The paper described the idea as "the greatest railway project of all time."

The tunnel would mean Russian territory would meet U.S. jurisdiction underneath the islands of Big Diomede, which is Russian, and Little Diomede, which is American.
The Times named one of the officials supporting the plan as Aleksandr Levinthal, the deputy federal representative for the Russian Far East.

The idea dates back more than a century; the ill-fated tsar, Nicholas II, approved similar tunnel plans twice, but World War I and then the Russian revolution intervened.

Cheaper, faster than container ships

The paper said supporters of the idea believe it would be a cheaper, faster and safer way to move goods around the world than container ships, estimating it could carry about 3 per cent of global freight and make about $7 billion a year.

Levinthal and several other Moscow officials took part in a conference in Yakutsk in eastern Russia that discussed how to improve infrastructure in the region, the Times said.

A 500-mile rail line linking Yakutsk to the Trans-Siberian railway is currently being built and Russia plans to lay more track to connect mineral-rich areas to freight lines.
"We should see advanced development of road and rail infrastructure here [in the Russian Far East] and improvement in the investment climate in Russia as a key aim," Levinthal said, according to The Times.

The tunnel would be the first dry connection between the two continents since a land bridge 21,000 years ago.


Okay, so it'd take several trains, and a long time, to grow from Times Square to King's Cross, but still: my mind has officially just been blown.
 
I prefer the version I saw on Extreme Engineering, which would have gone directly between the two cities. Total transit time would be about ONE HOUR.
 
Cheaper, faster than container ships

This is the part that hard to believe, rail is cheap don't get me wrong, but cheaper than these megaships? Also, the rail line would be across large section of the earth where it would service no one.

Now a rail line between China and the west coast of America, that would be shorter and would have definite customers at both ends.

What's in London anyways beside great restaurants and rioting mobs?
 
What's in London anyways beside great restaurants and rioting mobs?

TKzJW.jpg
 
Now a rail line between China and the west coast of America, that would be shorter and would have definite customers at both ends.
China and the US are 65 miles apart? Holy shit, every globe I've ever seen is full of crap! :rolleyes: :p
 
^ I have nothing against this pony stuff. I mean, hell, I'm a grown man who likes VeggieTales, so who am I to judge? :lol:

Back on topic, I would totally love a NYC-London rail link. I'd finally get to visit my relatives! (they live in Clapham Common)
 
Why? So it could block aquatic traffic, use hundreds of times the resources of a tunnel, and require loads more upkeep? :rolleyes:
 
Wouldn't they also need to construct a line from the tip of the Seward Peninsula to Fairbanks and the on to somewhere like Edmonton in Canada? That must be a couple of thousand miles at least. I don't think a rail link currently exists all the way from the continental US to Fairbanks or Anchorage.
 
Now a rail line between China and the west coast of America, that would be shorter and would have definite customers at both ends.
China and the US are 65 miles apart? Holy shit, every globe I've ever seen is full of crap! :rolleyes: :p

If such a tunnel got built (and if you ask me it's complete fantasy) why shouldn't chinese goods travel though there as well if it's really so much cheaper than container ships?
 
Now a rail line between China and the west coast of America, that would be shorter and would have definite customers at both ends.
China and the US are 65 miles apart? Holy shit, every globe I've ever seen is full of crap! :rolleyes: :p
Ummm, up the east coast of Asia, across the Bering Strait, across Alaska, down the west coast of North America.

How much freight move between New York and London?

:)
 
Now a rail line between China and the west coast of America, that would be shorter and would have definite customers at both ends.
China and the US are 65 miles apart? Holy shit, every globe I've ever seen is full of crap! :rolleyes: :p

If such a tunnel got built (and if you ask me it's complete fantasy) why shouldn't chinese goods travel though there as well if it's really so much cheaper than container ships?


Using the tunnel would mean less traffic through China's ports (less taxes) while having to pay (and rely on) the Russians for using their tunnel. Not a great deal for the Chinese.
 
I'd rather see a two-tier vehicle/train tunnel between mainland B.C. to Vancouver Island, connecting to upgraded mass transit rail lines (some already existing on the south end of the island) going from Victoria, through Campbell River, to Port Hardy at the north end. The ferry fares here are becoming cost-prohibitive to local tourism business & residents.
 
Nah the multi-tunnel system across the Atlantic is better so you go from same Newfoundalnd/Canada to greenland, then onto Iceland and then onto Scotland.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top