Re: A Hater Revisits Voyager

Braga: "I jumped the shark? Eh, who cares."

Braga: "I jumped the shark? Eh, who cares."
Aha, I knew it! Janeway is Maris Crane!Frasier: Yes, you sit at the piano every Sunday morning and play Mahler for Maris. But you hate Mahler! Besides Maris, who doesn't?!
Kashyk has double-crossed his people, but he's actually double-crossing Janeway (which makes it a triple-cross), but then we realise that Janeway has double-crossed Kashyk (which makes it a quadruple-cross). Did Janeway really feel anything for Kashyk or was she just playing him? Did Kashyk feel anything for her or was he just playing her? The episode doesn't know, it is content to end without truly exploring anybody's real feelings.
Counterpoint (**½)
Counterpoint (**½)
Aha, I knew it! Janeway is Maris Crane!Frasier: Yes, you sit at the piano every Sunday morning and play Mahler for Maris. But you hate Mahler! Besides Maris, who doesn't?!It all makes sense now.
{snip}
The word I can best use to describe this episode is "interesting", but that is probably a damning remark. There's a lot of story potential here and the fact that the episode doesn't spin that potential into something good is a great loss for the show. I wasn't bored, but I feel this episode could have been so much more.
Two shuttles were taken by the telepaths, two torpedoes were fired.
Shuttles Lost: 11
Torpedoes: 41/38
Grrr, the one with Jurot, the Betazoid who was never mentioned before or since. How about deducting half a star for each episode in which she would be useful, but doesn't appear?
I like the episode, because I think it's actually quite a good romance episode for Star Trek standards, and certainly the best on Voyager. I think it's stylish, the music is great, and the idea of having to put the Catholics away in priest holes is interesting. The sci-fi bit with the wormholes is quite incidental.
I'm still not altogether sure who was playing who, and at what point Janeway realised he realised that she realised that he realised that she realised he was lying. Or even if he was. I probably need to watch it again. Anyway, Kate Mulgrew and Mark Harelik were both very good, and it's quite a different sort of episode for the show.
So for those of you who wonder why I'm so cynical it's because I tried being an optimist and it didn't work out so good.Friend: Hey GodBen, did you see Voyager last night.
Me: Why did you call me GodBen? My name is Steve.
Friend: I'm just trying to make this conversation easier to understand for the people who are going to read about it a decade from now.
Me: Why would people be reading about this conversation ten years in the future?
Friend: Because the internet means that the opinion of any random idiot who can put together a sentence will matter, and it helps if that idiot tries to hide his intellectual shortcomings behind excessive humour.
Me: Duly noted.
Friend: Can we get back on topic?
Me: Yeah, I saw Voyager. It was a pretty good episode, I'm just confused about what happened at the end.
Friend: Well what I think happened is that Doctor Shmully read the poem and it fixed him so that everything will be back to normal next week.
Me: I doubt that's what happened, it seems far too simplistic. I think you're underestimating the show a little bit, I'm sure that there will be some consequences from this that will be addressed next week.
Shmully has a camera that can "see" through clothing and he's using it to take a picture of a little girl? Somebody alert Tuvok!SHMULLY: I made [my camera] part of the annual check-up. It's quite handy really, by attuning the resonance spectrum along the subspace band I can take an image of my patients all the way down to the subatomic level.
NAOMI: Subatomic level? I thought you said this wasn't going to hurt.
SHMULLY: I did, and it won't. There. See? Nothing to it.
The ending could have been better, but this still beats most episodes of the show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.